On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 06:23:20AM +0530, sourab gupta wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 14:40 -0800, Roper, Matthew D wrote:
> > Am I correct in assuming the data made available via drmfs is not
> > considered ABI? If we're not going to guarantee a stable ABI and
> > backward compatibility forever
On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 14:40 -0800, Roper, Matthew D wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 01:44:15PM +0530, swati.dhin...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Swati Dhingra
> >
> > The patch introduces a new pseudo filesystem type, named 'drmfs' which is
> > intended to house the files
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 01:44:15PM +0530, swati.dhin...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Swati Dhingra
>
> The patch introduces a new pseudo filesystem type, named 'drmfs' which is
> intended to house the files for the data generated by drm subsystem that
> cannot be
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 23:53 -0800, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 01:44:15PM +0530, swati.dhin...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Swati Dhingra
> >
> > The patch introduces a new pseudo filesystem type, named 'drmfs' which is
> > intended to house the files
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 01:44:15PM +0530, swati.dhin...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Swati Dhingra
>
> The patch introduces a new pseudo filesystem type, named 'drmfs' which is
> intended to house the files for the data generated by drm subsystem that
> cannot be
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 02:07:19PM +0530, sourab gupta wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 00:11 -0800, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:32:31PM +0530, swati.dhin...@intel.com wrote:
> > > diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
> > > index 4bd03a2..7d0ac20 100644
> > > --- a/fs/Kconfig
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 02:01:59PM +0530, sourab gupta wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 00:07 -0800, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:32:31PM +0530, swati.dhin...@intel.com wrote:
> > > +int drmfs_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > + int retval;
> > > +
> > > + retval =
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 00:11 -0800, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:32:31PM +0530, swati.dhin...@intel.com wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
> > index 4bd03a2..7d0ac20 100644
> > --- a/fs/Kconfig
> > +++ b/fs/Kconfig
> > @@ -200,6 +200,15 @@ config HUGETLBFS
> >
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 00:07 -0800, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:32:31PM +0530, swati.dhin...@intel.com wrote:
> > +int drmfs_init(void)
> > +{
> > + int retval;
> > +
> > + retval = sysfs_create_mount_point(kernel_kobj, "drm");
> > + if (retval)
> > + return
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:32:31PM +0530, swati.dhin...@intel.com wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
> index 4bd03a2..7d0ac20 100644
> --- a/fs/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/Kconfig
> @@ -200,6 +200,15 @@ config HUGETLBFS
> config HUGETLB_PAGE
> def_bool HUGETLBFS
>
> +config DRMFS
> +
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:32:31PM +0530, swati.dhin...@intel.com wrote:
> +int drmfs_init(void)
> +{
> + int retval;
> +
> + retval = sysfs_create_mount_point(kernel_kobj, "drm");
> + if (retval)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + retval = register_filesystem(_fs_type);
> +
From: Swati Dhingra
The patch introduces a new pseudo filesystem type, named 'drmfs' which is
intended to house the files for the data generated by drm subsystem that
cannot be accommodated by any of the existing filesystems.
The filesystem is modelled on the lines of
From: Swati Dhingra
The patch introduces a new pseudo filesystem type, named 'drmfs' which is
intended to house the files for the data generated by drm subsystem that
cannot be accommodated by any of the existing filesystems.
The filesystem is modelled on the lines of
13 matches
Mail list logo