Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 2/2] drm/i915: Engine capabilities uAPI

2017-06-23 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-06-23 12:58:19) > > On 21/06/2017 10:45, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-06-21 10:13:57) > >> From: Tvrtko Ursulin > >> > >> This is a lighter-weight alternative to the previously posted > >> RFC titled "drm/i915: Engine

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 2/2] drm/i915: Engine capabilities uAPI

2017-06-23 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 21/06/2017 10:45, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-06-21 10:13:57) From: Tvrtko Ursulin This is a lighter-weight alternative to the previously posted RFC titled "drm/i915: Engine discovery uAPI" which still allows some engine configuration probing

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 2/2] drm/i915: Engine capabilities uAPI

2017-06-21 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-06-21 10:13:57) > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > This is a lighter-weight alternative to the previously posted > RFC titled "drm/i915: Engine discovery uAPI" which still allows > some engine configuration probing without depending on PCI ids. > >

[Intel-gfx] [RFC 2/2] drm/i915: Engine capabilities uAPI

2017-06-21 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin This is a lighter-weight alternative to the previously posted RFC titled "drm/i915: Engine discovery uAPI" which still allows some engine configuration probing without depending on PCI ids. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin