Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 4/8] drm/i915: Group gen 10 display.

2018-10-19 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 09:41:37AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 01:33:08PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:30:46AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:03:53AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > > On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Rodrigo

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 4/8] drm/i915: Group gen 10 display.

2018-10-19 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 01:33:08PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:30:46AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:03:53AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > > Continuing with the goal of use less platform

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 4/8] drm/i915: Group gen 10 display.

2018-10-19 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:03:53AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > Continuing with the goal of use less platform codenames: > > let's group platforms who has gen10 display. > > Ahah, so this answers my question in the previous patch. ;) > > So we already

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 4/8] drm/i915: Group gen 10 display.

2018-10-19 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 01:33:08PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:30:46AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:03:53AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > > Continuing with the goal of use less platform

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 4/8] drm/i915: Group gen 10 display.

2018-10-19 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:30:46AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:03:53AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > Continuing with the goal of use less platform codenames: > > > let's group platforms who has gen10 display. > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 4/8] drm/i915: Group gen 10 display.

2018-10-19 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Daniel Vetter (2018-10-19 11:30:46) > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:03:53AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > Continuing with the goal of use less platform codenames: > > > let's group platforms who has gen10 display. > > > > Ahah, so this answers

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 4/8] drm/i915: Group gen 10 display.

2018-10-19 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:03:53AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > Continuing with the goal of use less platform codenames: > > let's group platforms who has gen10 display. > > Ahah, so this answers my question in the previous patch. ;) > > So we already

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 4/8] drm/i915: Group gen 10 display.

2018-10-19 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Continuing with the goal of use less platform codenames: > let's group platforms who has gen10 display. Ahah, so this answers my question in the previous patch. ;) So we already have HAS_GMCH_DISPLAY(). If we're going to make gen10 display a thing,

[Intel-gfx] [RFC 4/8] drm/i915: Group gen 10 display.

2018-10-18 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Continuing with the goal of use less platform codenames: let's group platforms who has gen10 display. Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c | 2 +-