Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm: Increase DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY by 18.

2021-10-19 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2021-10-19 14:24:29 [+0200], Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Ah dmesg help me understand what's going on. Does the below patch help? If > it's this one that would also explain why intel CI hasn't hit it - it's a > leak between tests and we run them all individually instead of once at > boot-up. Yes,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm: Increase DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY by 18.

2021-10-19 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 03:47:31PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2021-10-14 15:21:22 [+0200], Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 07:35:48PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > c7fcbf2513973 -> does not boot > > > c7fcbf2513973 + 2f425cf5242a0 -> boots, 18 x

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm: Increase DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY by 18.

2021-10-14 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2021-10-14 15:21:22 [+0200], Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 07:35:48PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > c7fcbf2513973 -> does not boot > > c7fcbf2513973 + 2f425cf5242a0 -> boots, 18 x DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY > > 6f11f37459d8f -> boots, 0 x DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm: Increase DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY by 18.

2021-10-14 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 07:35:48PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2021-10-13 14:57:34 [+0200], Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Hm there's a pile of commits there, and nothing immediately jumps to > > light. The thing is, 18 is likely way too much, since if e.g. we have a > > single new

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm: Increase DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY by 18.

2021-10-13 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2021-10-13 14:57:34 [+0200], Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hm there's a pile of commits there, and nothing immediately jumps to > light. The thing is, 18 is likely way too much, since if e.g. we have a > single new property on a plane and that pushes over the limit on all of > them, you get iirc 3x4

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm: Increase DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY by 18.

2021-10-13 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 02:35:25PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2021-10-13 14:02:59 [+0200], Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 08:51:51AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > The warning poped up, it says it increase it by the number of occurrence. > > > I

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm: Increase DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY by 18.

2021-10-13 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2021-10-13 14:02:59 [+0200], Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 08:51:51AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > The warning poped up, it says it increase it by the number of occurrence. > > I saw it 18 times so here it is. > > It started to up since commit > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm: Increase DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY by 18.

2021-10-13 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 08:51:51AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > The warning poped up, it says it increase it by the number of occurrence. > I saw it 18 times so here it is. > It started to up since commit >2f425cf5242a0 ("drm: Fix oops in damage self-tests by mocking damage >

[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm: Increase DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY by 18.

2021-10-05 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
The warning poped up, it says it increase it by the number of occurrence. I saw it 18 times so here it is. It started to up since commit 2f425cf5242a0 ("drm: Fix oops in damage self-tests by mocking damage property") Increase DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY by 18. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej