Link to FDO regression list:
age-
From: Jani Nikula [mailto:jani.nik...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 3:20 AM
To: Jairo Miramontes <jairo.daniel.miramontes.ca...@linux.intel.com>;
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; otc gfx qa <otc.gfx...@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [Regression report] Weekly re
0 AM
> To: Jairo Miramontes <jairo.daniel.miramontes.ca...@linux.intel.com>;
> intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; otc gfx qa <otc.gfx...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [Regression report] Weekly regression report WW42
>
>
> Do all the bugs at fdo now have the appropri
>;
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; otc gfx qa <otc.gfx...@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [Regression report] Weekly regression report WW42
Do all the bugs at fdo now have the appropriate regression/bisected keywords?
Can we start using a bugzilla query link to get all the information in this
repor
Do all the bugs at fdo now have the appropriate regression/bisected
keywords? Can we start using a bugzilla query link to get all the
information in this report?
BR,
Jani.
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Jairo Miramontes
wrote:
> This weeknew regressions
>
This weeknew regressions
+---+---+++
| BugId | Summary | Created on |
Bisect |
+---+---+++
| 98213 | REGRESSION: GPU
On 10/16/2015 07:23 PM, jairo.daniel.miramontes.ca...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> | 92237 | Horrible noise (audio) via DisplayPort [regre | 2015-10-02 | No
> |
This issue actually IS bisected:
commit fdbc3b1f639bb2cbfb32c612b2699e0ba373317d
Author: Jani Nikula
Date: Tue Nov 12 17:10:13 2013
WW42 Regression report.
This week's regressions
+---+---+++
| BugId | Summary | Created on | Bisect |
+---+---+++
| 92355 |