Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-08-01 Thread Robert Hooker
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Valerio Camassa valerio...@gmail.com wrote:  I tried to change vblank_mode with driconf and with set param vblank_mode, but i obtain the same fps with 2.11 and 2.12 drivers: 311 frames in 5.0 seconds = 62.175 FPS With 2.12 glxgears rates ~700FPS.

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-08-01 Thread Valerio Camassa
I tried to change .drirc to add the xml for dri2 but glxgears still rating ~60FPS. Also with $ vblank_mode=0 glxgears it rates ~60FPS. Il 01/08/2010 17:26, Robert Hooker ha scritto: On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Valerio Camassavalerio...@gmail.com wrote: I tried to change vblank_mode

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-31 Thread Valerio Camassa
Ops, It's with with 2.10 i obtain ~700FPS, i mistyped, sorry. I tried to change vblank_mode with driconf and with set param vblank_mode, but i obtain the same fps with 2.11 and 2.12 drivers: / 311 frames in 5.0 seconds = 62.175 FPS / With 2.12 glxgears rates ~700FPS.

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-31 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Samstag, den 31.07.2010, 10:36 +0200 schrieb Valerio Camassa: I tried to change vblank_mode with driconf and with set param vblank_mode, but i obtain the same fps with 2.11 and 2.12 drivers: 311 frames in 5.0 seconds = 62.175 FPS With 2.12 glxgears rates ~700FPS. 62.175 FPS ≠ 700 FPS

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-31 Thread Valerio Camassa
62.175 FPS ≠ 700 FPS Why do you write it is the same? Thanks, Paul Sorry, I wrote, soon after, that I mistyped. Is with 2.10 that glxgears rates ~700fps. With 2.11 and 2.12 rates ~60fps. ___ Intel-gfx mailing list

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-30 Thread Camassa Valerio
Hi, i have the same problems with 2.11 and 2.12 intel driver and mesa 7.8. In 3D application i have annoying stuttering and in glxgears (and others 3d application) i don't obtain more than 60fps (i think is active vsync). The stuttering problem is mitigated with mesa 7.9 (but is not solved),

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-30 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 15:20 +0200, Camassa Valerio wrote: the vsync problem is solved with downgrade to 2.10 drivers and i would to say how can i disable vsync in new driver? i watched the configure compile options of mesa and drv-intel packages, but i didn't find anything. It's not a

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-29 Thread Tino Keitel
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 23:29:02 +0200, Hanno Böck wrote: Am Mittwoch 28 Juli 2010 schrieb Matt Turner: On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Hanno Böck ha...@hboeck.de wrote: Hi, it seems I'm currently getting insanely slow 3d performance on my system. q3demo benchmark (run with ` to

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-29 Thread Hanno Böck
Am Donnerstag 29 Juli 2010 schrieb Tino Keitel: When I tried Mesa 7.8 from Debian experimental I got stuttering 3D output, at least in neverball and glxgears. I tried libdrm2 2.4.18, 2.4.21, kernel 2.6.34, 2.6.35-rc5, and the Intel driver 2.11 and 2.12, without a change to the stuttering. The

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-29 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Hanno Böck ha...@hboeck.de wrote: Am Donnerstag 29 Juli 2010 schrieb Tino Keitel: When I tried Mesa 7.8 from Debian experimental I got stuttering 3D output, at least in neverball and glxgears. I tried libdrm2 2.4.18, 2.4.21, kernel 2.6.34, 2.6.35-rc5, and the

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-29 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Donnerstag, den 29.07.2010, 12:24 -0400 schrieb Matt Turner: On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Hanno Böck ha...@hboeck.de wrote: Am Donnerstag 29 Juli 2010 schrieb Tino Keitel: When I tried Mesa 7.8 from Debian experimental I got stuttering 3D output, at least in neverball and glxgears.

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-29 Thread Philipp Klaus Krause
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 29.07.2010 18:24, schrieb Matt Turner: You're saying it's slow, but in relation to what? Were previous versions faster, or is the comparison being made between hardware? Well I see the same problem here, using OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-29 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 28/07/2010 23:17, Hanno Böck a écrit : Hi, it seems I'm currently getting insanely slow 3d performance on my system. q3demo benchmark (run with ` to start console, timedemo 1, demo demo001) gives me 57 fps. I think even my old r200 got more than 100 there. From the logs everything

[Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-28 Thread Hanno Böck
Hi, it seems I'm currently getting insanely slow 3d performance on my system. q3demo benchmark (run with ` to start console, timedemo 1, demo demo001) gives me 57 fps. I think even my old r200 got more than 100 there. From the logs everything seems to be fine. Any ideas what I could look for

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-28 Thread Hanno Böck
Am Mittwoch 28 Juli 2010 schrieb Matt Turner: On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Hanno Böck ha...@hboeck.de wrote: Hi, it seems I'm currently getting insanely slow 3d performance on my system. q3demo benchmark (run with ` to start console, timedemo 1, demo demo001) gives me 57 fps. I