On Tue 2020-09-01 13:57:55, Harald Arnesen wrote:
> Still (rc3) doesn't work without the three reverts.
>
> I'm not sure how to proceed, I cannot capture any oops, and see nothing
> obvious in any logs.
I believe this is the place when you ask Linus for reverts...
Best regards,
Still (rc3) doesn't work without the three reverts.
I'm not sure how to proceed, I cannot capture any oops, and see nothing
obvious in any logs.
--
Hilsen Harald
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi!
> >> It's a Thinkpad T520.
> >
> > Oh, so this is a 64-bit machine? Yeah, that patch to flush vmalloc
> > ranges won't make any difference on x86-64.
> >
> > Or are you for some reason running a 32-bit kernel on that thing? Have
> > you tried building a 64-bit one (user-space can be 32-bit,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 1:53 PM Harald Arnesen wrote:
>
> It's a Thinkpad T520.
Oh, so this is a 64-bit machine? Yeah, that patch to flush vmalloc
ranges won't make any difference on x86-64.
Or are you for some reason running a 32-bit kernel on that thing? Have
you tried building a 64-bit one
Dave Airlie [26.08.2020 22:47]:
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 06:44, Harald Arnesen wrote:
>>
>> Linus Torvalds [26.08.2020 20:04]:
>>
>> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:30 AM Harald Arnesen wrote:
>> >> Somehow related to lightdm or xfce4? However, it is a regression, since
>> >> kernel 5.8 works.
>> >
On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 06:44, Harald Arnesen wrote:
>
> Linus Torvalds [26.08.2020 20:04]:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:30 AM Harald Arnesen wrote:
> >> Somehow related to lightdm or xfce4? However, it is a regression, since
> >> kernel 5.8 works.
> > Yeah, apparently there's something else
Linus Torvalds [26.08.2020 20:04]:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:30 AM Harald Arnesen wrote:
>> Somehow related to lightdm or xfce4? However, it is a regression, since
>> kernel 5.8 works.
> Yeah, apparently there's something else wrong with the relocation changes too.
>
> That said, does that
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:30 AM Harald Arnesen wrote:
>
> Somehow related to lightdm or xfce4? However, it is a regression, since
> kernel 5.8 works.
Yeah, apparently there's something else wrong with the relocation changes too.
That said, does that patch at
Harald Arnesen [26.08.2020 10:36]:
> I was wrong about ssh working. The whole machine locks up when X starts.
>
> A strange thing, sometimes I can log in from lightdm before it locks up,
> sometimes I cannot even use the login screen. Timing related?
>
> If I don't start X, console login seems
Linus Torvalds [25.08.2020 20:19]:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 9:32 AM Harald Arnesen wrote:
>>
>> > For posterity, I'm told the fix is [1].
>> >
>> > [1]
>> > https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/20200821123746.16904-1-j...@8bytes.org/
>>
>> Doesn't fix it for me. As soon as I start XFCE, the mouse
Linus Torvalds [25.08.2020 20:19]:
>> Doesn't fix it for me. As soon as I start XFCE, the mouse and keyboard
>> freeezes. I can still ssh into the machine
>>
>> The three reverts (763fedd6a216, 7ac2d2536dfa and 9e0f9464e2ab) fixes
>> the bug for me.
> Do you get any oops or other indication of
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 9:32 AM Harald Arnesen wrote:
>
> > For posterity, I'm told the fix is [1].
> >
> > [1]
> > https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/20200821123746.16904-1-j...@8bytes.org/
>
> Doesn't fix it for me. As soon as I start XFCE, the mouse and keyboard
> freeezes. I can still ssh
Jani Nikula [25.08.2020 11:55]:
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> On Thu 2020-08-20 09:16:18, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 2:23 AM Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Yes, it seems they make things work. (Chris asked for new patch to be
>>> > tested, so I am
On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2020-08-20 09:16:18, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 2:23 AM Pavel Machek wrote:
>> >
>> > Yes, it seems they make things work. (Chris asked for new patch to be
>> > tested, so I am switching to his kernel, but it survived longer
On Thu 2020-08-20 09:16:18, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 2:23 AM Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > Yes, it seems they make things work. (Chris asked for new patch to be
> > tested, so I am switching to his kernel, but it survived longer than
> > it usually does.)
>
> Ok, so at worst
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 2:23 AM Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Yes, it seems they make things work. (Chris asked for new patch to be
> tested, so I am switching to his kernel, but it survived longer than
> it usually does.)
Ok, so at worst we know how to solve it, at best the reverts won't be
needed
Hi!
> > I think there's been some discussion about reverting that change for
> > other reasons, but it's quite likely the culprit.
>
> Hmm. It reverts cleanly, but the end result doesn't work, because of
> other changes.
>
> Reverting all of
>
>763fedd6a216 ("drm/i915: Remove
On Tue 2020-08-18 18:59:27, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 6:13 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > I think there's been some discussion about reverting that change for
> > other reasons, but it's quite likely the culprit.
>
> Hmm. It reverts cleanly, but the end result doesn't work,
Hi!
> > I think there's been some discussion about reverting that change for
> > other reasons, but it's quite likely the culprit.
>
> Hmm. It reverts cleanly, but the end result doesn't work, because of
> other changes.
>
> Reverting all of
>
>763fedd6a216 ("drm/i915: Remove
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 6:13 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> I think there's been some discussion about reverting that change for
> other reasons, but it's quite likely the culprit.
Hmm. It reverts cleanly, but the end result doesn't work, because of
other changes.
Reverting all of
763fedd6a216
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 10:38, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> Ping on this?
>
> The code disassembles to
>
> 24: 8b 85 d0 fd ff ffmov-0x230(%ebp),%eax
> 2a:* c7 03 01 00 40 10movl $0x1041,(%ebx) <-- trapping instruction
> 30: 89 43 04 mov%eax,0x4(%ebx)
> 33:
Ping on this?
The code disassembles to
24: 8b 85 d0 fd ff ffmov-0x230(%ebp),%eax
2a:* c7 03 01 00 40 10movl $0x1041,(%ebx) <-- trapping instruction
30: 89 43 04 mov%eax,0x4(%ebx)
33: 8b 85 b4 fd ff ffmov-0x24c(%ebp),%eax
39: 89 43 08
Hi!
After about half an hour of uptime, screen starts blinking on thinkpad
x60 and machine becomes unusable.
I already reported this in -next, and now it is in mainline. It is
32-bit x86 system.
Pavel
Aug 17 17:36:04 amd
23 matches
Mail list logo
