; Korjani, Vikas
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] Design review request: DRM color manager
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:52:38AM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
[...]
> Please note that the color correction methods changes per platform and
> what's valid for one Intel platform may not be valid for ot
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:52:38AM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
[...]
> Please note that the color correction methods changes per platform and
> what's valid for one Intel platform may not be valid for other. So the
> atomic modeset should have a clear idea of what is supported on which
> platfor
What I understood from the reviews comments from the experts, is having
a central color management at DRM kernel layer is not a good idea, and
we should create individual DRM properties for the color correction
methods, and let the control be there in the user space level, where an
atomic modes
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 09:18:45AM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> Daniel,
> Please find my comments inline.
>
> Regards
> Shashank
> On 5/12/2014 8:58 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 05:35:13PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> >>Thanks for your time and the comments David.
>
Daniel,
Please find my comments inline.
Regards
Shashank
On 5/12/2014 8:58 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 05:35:13PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
Thanks for your time and the comments David.
please find mine inline.
Regards
Shashank
On 5/12/2014 5:20 PM, David Herrmann wrot
Hi
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Those are all just reasons for atomic modeset and maybe an atomic modeget
> ioctl which transfers the entire blob of things. Maybe we should start
> with the atomic modeget to get things rolling. Otoh you can always do that
> in userspace
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 05:35:13PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> Thanks for your time and the comments David.
> please find mine inline.
>
> Regards
> Shashank
> On 5/12/2014 5:20 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> >Hi
> >
> >On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Sharma, Shashank
> > wrote:
> >>Benefits o
Thanks for your time and the comments David.
please find mine inline.
Regards
Shashank
On 5/12/2014 5:20 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Sharma, Shashank
wrote:
Benefits of using color manager:
1. Unique framework for all the col
Hi
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Sharma, Shashank
wrote:
> Benefits of using color manager:
>
> 1. Unique framework for all the color correction properties, across all
>DRM drivers, across various platforms.
> 2. Only one set/get call for all kind of prope
hank
On 5/7/2014 7:41 PM, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
FYI
-Original Message-
From: Sharma, Shashank
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:32 PM
To: Daniel Vetter
Cc: David Herrmann; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Cn, Ramakrishnan;
Jindal, Sonika; Shankar, Uma
Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] Design revie
- Can be clubbed with modeset implementations.
>
>
>
>
> Regards
> Shashank
>
> On 5/7/2014 7:41 PM, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
>>
>> FYI
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Sharma, Shashank
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:32 PM
...@intel.com
Subject: [Intel-gfx] Design review request: DRM color manager
Hello all,
As per previous discussions, I am sending the drm-color-manager design for
review, as inline text. Please have a look and let me know your feedback.
(I tried hard to align the inline text diagram in mail, hope you
ma
Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] Design review request: DRM color manager
David,
My apologies for starting a pre-mature design discussion.
Daniel,
Thanks for pointing out first two things, It was not known to me, I will take
care of this in future.
First time I presented color-manager design, in internal
Behalf Of Daniel Vetter
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 7:18 PM
To: Sharma, Shashank
Cc: David Herrmann; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org;
dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; Thierry Reding; Cn, Ramakrishnan; Alex
Deucher; Jindal, Sonika; Shankar, Uma
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] Design review request: DRM color
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:07:41PM +, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> Thanks again David,
> Comments inline.
Three things:
- Please don't send out .pptx files to upstream/public mailing lists,
that's just not how the upstream community works.
- Please either fix up ms outlook to do proper in-li
Thanks again David,
Comments inline.
Regards
Shashank
-Original Message-
From: David Herrmann [mailto:dh.herrm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 5:10 PM
To: Sharma, Shashank
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; Ville
Syrjälä; Thierry Reding; A
Hi
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Sharma, Shashank
wrote:
> 1) Why do you register only a single property? Why not register a separate
> property for each color-correction that is available? This way you can drop
> the property-id and use the high-level DRM-prop IDs/names.
>>> That’s the who
Thanks for the review and comments David.
Please find my comments inline.
Regards
Shashank
-Original Message-
From: David Herrmann [mailto:dh.herrm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 3:08 PM
To: Sharma, Shashank
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop
Hi
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:11 AM, Sharma, Shashank
wrote:
> Gentle reminder
Usual approach is to send any proposals as inline plain-text. It's
really hard to comment on attachments, especially if it's an MS-office
format. Anyhow, some comments on the proposal:
1) Why do you register only a si
Gentle reminder
Regards
Shashank
-Original Message-
From: Sharma, Shashank
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 12:01 PM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; Ville
Syrjälä; Thierry Reding; Alex Deucher; Sean Paul; robdcl...@gmail.com
Cc: Shankar, Uma; Korjani, V
20 matches
Mail list logo
