Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

2023-11-24 Thread Luben Tuikov
On 2023-11-24 08:20, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2023, Luben Tuikov wrote: >> On 2023-11-22 07:00, Maxime Ripard wrote: >>> Hi Luben, >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 09:27:58AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 09:11:43AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Tue, Nov

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

2023-11-24 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023, Luben Tuikov wrote: > On 2023-11-22 07:00, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> Hi Luben, >> >> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 09:27:58AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 09:11:43AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 06:46:21PM -0500, Luben Tuikov wro

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

2023-11-22 Thread Luben Tuikov
On 2023-11-22 07:00, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Luben, > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 09:27:58AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 09:11:43AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 06:46:21PM -0500, Luben Tuikov wrote: On 2023-11-13 22:08, Stephen Rothwell wr

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

2023-11-22 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi Luben, On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 09:27:58AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 09:11:43AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 06:46:21PM -0500, Luben Tuikov wrote: > > > On 2023-11-13 22:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > BTW, cherry picking commits does no

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

2023-11-16 Thread Luben Tuikov
On 2023-11-16 04:22, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:56:32PM -0500, Luben Tuikov wrote: >> On 2023-11-13 21:45, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi Luben, >>> >>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 20:32:40 -0500 Luben Tuikov wrote: On 2023-11-13 20:08, Luben Tuikov wrote: > O

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

2023-11-16 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi, On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:56:32PM -0500, Luben Tuikov wrote: > On 2023-11-13 21:45, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Luben, > > > > On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 20:32:40 -0500 Luben Tuikov wrote: > >> > >> On 2023-11-13 20:08, Luben Tuikov wrote: > >>> On 2023-11-13 15:55, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

2023-11-16 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 09:11:43AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 06:46:21PM -0500, Luben Tuikov wrote: > > On 2023-11-13 22:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > BTW, cherry picking commits does not avoid conflicts - in fact it can > > > cause conflicts if there are further chan

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

2023-11-16 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 06:46:21PM -0500, Luben Tuikov wrote: > On 2023-11-13 22:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > BTW, cherry picking commits does not avoid conflicts - in fact it can > > cause conflicts if there are further changes to the files affected by > > the cherry picked commit in either the

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

2023-11-14 Thread Luben Tuikov
On 2023-11-13 22:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Luben, > > BTW, cherry picking commits does not avoid conflicts - in fact it can > cause conflicts if there are further changes to the files affected by > the cherry picked commit in either the tree/branch the commit was > cheery picked from or the

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

2023-11-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Luben, BTW, cherry picking commits does not avoid conflicts - in fact it can cause conflicts if there are further changes to the files affected by the cherry picked commit in either the tree/branch the commit was cheery picked from or the destination tree/branch (I have to deal with these all t

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

2023-11-13 Thread Luben Tuikov
On 2023-11-13 21:45, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Luben, > > On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 20:32:40 -0500 Luben Tuikov wrote: >> >> On 2023-11-13 20:08, Luben Tuikov wrote: >>> On 2023-11-13 15:55, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Commit 0da611a87021 ("dma-buf: add dma_fence_tim

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

2023-11-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Luben, On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 20:32:40 -0500 Luben Tuikov wrote: > > On 2023-11-13 20:08, Luben Tuikov wrote: > > On 2023-11-13 15:55, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Commit > >> > >> 0da611a87021 ("dma-buf: add dma_fence_timestamp helper") > >> > >> is missing a Signed-off-by

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

2023-11-13 Thread Luben Tuikov
On 2023-11-13 20:08, Luben Tuikov wrote: > On 2023-11-13 15:55, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Commit >> >> 0da611a87021 ("dma-buf: add dma_fence_timestamp helper") >> >> is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. >> > > In order to merge the scheduler changes necessary for the Xe

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

2023-11-13 Thread Luben Tuikov
On 2023-11-13 15:55, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Commit > > 0da611a87021 ("dma-buf: add dma_fence_timestamp helper") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. > In order to merge the scheduler changes necessary for the Xe driver, those changes were based on drm-tip, which

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

2023-11-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Commit 0da611a87021 ("dma-buf: add dma_fence_timestamp helper") is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell pgpVEQIISTHPP.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature