Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Jan 27 (drm/i915)

2021-01-27 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Randy Dunlap (2021-01-27 20:28:05) > On 1/27/21 11:30 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 1/27/21 11:08 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 1/27/21 6:44 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Note: the patch file has failed to upload :-( > >>> > >>> Changes since 20210125: > >>> > >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Jan 27 (drm/i915)

2021-01-27 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 1/27/21 11:30 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 1/27/21 11:08 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 1/27/21 6:44 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Note: the patch file has failed to upload :-( >>> >>> Changes since 20210125: >>> >> >> on x86_64: >> >> ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c: In func

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Jan 27 (drm/i915)

2021-01-27 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 1/27/21 11:08 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 1/27/21 6:44 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Note: the patch file has failed to upload :-( >> >> Changes since 20210125: >> > > on x86_64: > > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c: In function ‘i915_gem_freeze_late’: > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i9

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Jan 27 (drm/i915)

2021-01-27 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 1/27/21 6:44 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Note: the patch file has failed to upload :-( > > Changes since 20210125: > on x86_64: ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c: In function ‘i915_gem_freeze_late’: ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:1182:2: error: implicit declaration of fu