Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

> I applied the following fix patch: > > From: Stephen Rothwell > Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 18:37:40 +1000 > Subject: [PATCH] drm/virtio: module_param_named() requires linux/moduleparam.h > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c | 2 ++ > 1 file

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this: drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c:31:67: error: expected ')' before 'int' module_param_named(virglhack, virtio_gpu_virglrenderer_workaround, int, 0400);

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c: In function 'amdgpu_bo_release_notify': drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c:1245:28: error: 'struct ttm_buffer_object' has no member

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c: In function 'radeon_add_legacy_connector': drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c:2433:5: error: 'ddc' undeclared (first use in this

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c:4031:18: error: initialization of 'int (*)(struct drm_connector *, struct drm_atomic_state *)' from incompatible pointer type

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 06:08:55PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Gerd, > > > >drm_fb_memcpy_dstclip(__io_virt(cirrus->vram), > > > ^ > > > __do_irq > > > > Probably just a missing arm/io.h include. > > I assume you meant

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Gerd, On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:22:18 +0200 Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:08:49PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:08:49PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/cirrus/cirrus.c: In function 'cirrus_fb_blit_rect': > drivers/gpu/drm/cirrus/cirrus.c:310:25:

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this: drivers/gpu/drm/cirrus/cirrus.c: In function 'cirrus_fb_blit_rect': drivers/gpu/drm/cirrus/cirrus.c:310:25: error: implicit declaration of function '__io_virt'; did you mean '__do_irq'?

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Dave, On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 15:55:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > kernel/dma/contiguous.c:19:10: fatal error: asm/dma-contiguous.h: No such > file or directory > #include >

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this: kernel/dma/contiguous.c:19:10: fatal error: asm/dma-contiguous.h: No such file or directory #include ^~ Caused by commit 4f2a8f5898ec ("drm: Add ASPEED

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:56:08PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:26 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote: > > > Thanks, patch is: > > > Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu > > > > This looks like a fairly naive conversion from the old

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:26 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote: > > Thanks, patch is: > > Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu > > This looks like a fairly naive conversion from the old IDR API to the > XArray API. You should be able to remove mgr->lock

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:21 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 10:50:06AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c > > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ int lima_ctx_create(struct lima_device *dev, struct > > lima_ctx_mgr *mgr, u32 *id) > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote: > Thanks, patch is: > Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu This looks like a fairly naive conversion from the old IDR API to the XArray API. You should be able to remove mgr->lock entirely, relying on the xa_lock for synchronising free and get. If you

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 10:50:06AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ int lima_ctx_create(struct lima_device *dev, struct > lima_ctx_mgr *mgr, u32 *id) > goto err_out0; > } > > - err = xa_alloc(>handles, id,

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 04:59:37PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:57 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote: > > > Thanks, patch is: > > > Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu > > > > Good time to get started with committing patches? In

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:57 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote: > > Thanks, patch is: > > Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu > > Good time to get started with committing patches? In general it's kinda > confusing if the maintainer r-bs a patch, but doesn't

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote: > Thanks, patch is: > Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu Good time to get started with committing patches? In general it's kinda confusing if the maintainer r-bs a patch, but doesn't say whether/when/how it gets merged. Big chance the patch will get

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Thanks, patch is: Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu Regards, Qiang On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:50 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:7, >

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:7, from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18, from arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:83, from

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Daniel/Stephen Thanks for the report and the hints how to move forward to fix it. > Sam, can you pls take a look at what komeda needs? you need to > manually merge together drm-misc-next and drm-next first I think. Merged the two tree and fixed build. Undid the merge and checked that the

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 2:38 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_drv.c:13: >

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_drv.c:13: drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.h:87:20: error: field 'base' has incomplete type struct drm_device

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Daniel, On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 09:37:22 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-tip/tree/fixups/drm-misc-next.patch?h=rerere-cache > > is the fixup you want. Should get baked into drm-next any moment, since > the first drm-misc-next pull is already out. I added that

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On 1/8/19 3:37 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 11:12:41AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 >> allmodconfig) failed like this: >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c: In

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 11:12:41AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c: In function > 'amdgpu_dm_mode_config_init': >

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c: In function 'amdgpu_dm_mode_config_init': drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c:1695:30: error: passing

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Stephen, yeah, that is a known problem. I missed the change during rebase of the revert. Please see patch "2312f9842854 drm/v3d: fix broken build" which is already in drm-misc-next and fixes the issue. Christian. Am 06.12.18 um 03:32 schrieb Stephen Rothwell: > Hi all, > > After merging

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_gem.c: In function 'v3d_submit_tfu_ioctl': drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_gem.c:719:3: error: too many arguments to function 'drm_syncobj_replace_fence'

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Rodrigo, On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 17:21:54 -0800 Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > I had just written the email for you about this. > Feel free to ignore that one since you already found the solution > and sorry for the delay on warning you. And I should read all my email before

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 01:00:15AM +, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, Hi Stephen, I had just written the email for you about this. Feel free to ignore that one since you already found the solution and sorry for the delay on warning you. > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c: In function 'intel_dsi_get_panel_orientation': drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c:1673:13: error: storage size of 'plane' isn't known enum plane plane;

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 10:24:41AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 2:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:24:49 +0200 Daniel Vetter > > wrote: > >> > >> How are we going to handle

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 2:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:24:49 +0200 Daniel Vetter > wrote: >> >> How are we going to handle this now? The refactor is deeply burried in >> drm-misc, I guess you could

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Daniel, On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:24:49 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: > > How are we going to handle this now? The refactor is deeply burried in > drm-misc, I guess you could cherry-pick the relevant patches over. But > that'll probably lead to more conflicts because git

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi, On 21-07-17 09:24, Daniel Vetter wrote: Hi Greg, How are we going to handle this now? The refactor is deeply burried in drm-misc, I guess you could cherry-pick the relevant patches over. But that'll probably lead to more conflicts because git will get confused. Or you could just delete

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Greg, How are we going to handle this now? The refactor is deeply burried in drm-misc, I guess you could cherry-pick the relevant patches over. But that'll probably lead to more conflicts because git will get confused. Or you could just delete the set_busid hook in -staging, which renders the

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Dave, The following is now applicable to the drm and staging.current trees ... On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:46:57 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > >

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_drv.c:235:2: error: unknown field 'set_busid' specified in initializer .set_busid = drm_pci_set_busid, ^ drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_drv.c:235:15:

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: Caused by commit b6dcaaac4474 ("drm/vblank: _ioctl posfix for ioctl handler") interacting with commit d5288c88c67c ("switch compat_drm_wait_vblank() to drm_ioctl_kernel()") from

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:10:14 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/tee/tee_shm.c:87:2: error: unknown field 'kmap_atomic' specified in > initializer >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> On Tue, 2 May 2017 10:25:18 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> >>> Since this is an all-new driver it might

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Tue, 2 May 2017 10:25:18 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >> Since this is an all-new driver it might be best to stagger the pull >> requests and merge the new tee subsystem (or

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Daniel, On Tue, 2 May 2017 10:25:18 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Since this is an all-new driver it might be best to stagger the pull > requests and merge the new tee subsystem (or whatever it is) after drm? > > Not sure what to best do here ... This will merge via Dave,

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:25:12AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:10:14 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:10:14 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/tee/tee_shm.c:87:2: error: unknown field 'kmap_atomic' specified in > initializer >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Thanks Stephen. Looks good to me. Logan On 20/04/17 08:10 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/tee/tee_shm.c:87:2: error: unknown field 'kmap_atomic' specified in > initializer

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/tee/tee_shm.c:87:2: error: unknown field 'kmap_atomic' specified in initializer .kmap_atomic = tee_shm_op_kmap_atomic, ^ drivers/tee/tee_shm.c:87:17: error: initialization from

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Thanks for this. This and "drm/vmwgfx: merge fixup for set_config API change": Reviewed-by: Sinclair Yeh On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 01:31:29PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_scrn.c: In function 'vmw_sou_crtc_page_flip': drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_scrn.c:327:8: error: too few arguments to function 'drm_atomic_helper_page_flip'

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Jani, On Thu, 05 Jan 2017 12:24:13 +0200 Jani Nikula wrote: > > Daniel reverted it in drm-misc. OK, thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Thu, 05 Jan 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/usb/Kconfig:39:error: recursive dependency detected! > drivers/usb/Kconfig:39: symbol USB is

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: drivers/usb/Kconfig:39:error: recursive dependency detected! drivers/usb/Kconfig:39: symbol USB is selected by MOUSE_APPLETOUCH drivers/input/mouse/Kconfig:187:symbol

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: ERROR: "depot_save_stack" [drivers/gpu/drm/drm.ko] undefined! ERROR: "depot_fetch_stack" [drivers/gpu/drm/drm.ko] undefined! Caused by commit 5705670d0463 ("drm: Track drm_mm allocators

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h:32:0, from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:36: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c: In function

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 02:17:41PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 09:41:38AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:24:51PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

[cc += Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-acpi] Hi Stephen, On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:24:51PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi, On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 09:41:38AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:24:51PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm > > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > > > In file included from

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c:25:0: include/linux/apple-gmux.h: In function 'apple_gmux_present': include/linux/apple-gmux.h:36:42: error: implicit

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:24:51PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c:25:0: > include/linux/apple-gmux.h: In function

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c:1354:2: error: unknown field 'save' specified in initializer .save = tda998x_encoder_save, ^ drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c:1354:10: warning:

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 12:47:17PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > ERROR: "drm_agp_release" [drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.ko] undefined! > ERROR: "drm_agp_acquire"

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: ERROR: "drm_agp_release" [drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.ko] undefined! ERROR: "drm_agp_acquire" [drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.ko] undefined! ERROR: "drm_agp_enable"

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 06:48:34AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 08-09-15 om 01:42 schreef Stephen Rothwell: > > Hi all, > > > > On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:49:19 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > >> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm > >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:49:19 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5_plane.c: In function > 'mdp5_plane_cleanup_fb': >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Op 08-09-15 om 01:42 schreef Stephen Rothwell: > Hi all, > > On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:49:19 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm >> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: >> >>

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5_plane.c: In function 'mdp5_plane_cleanup_fb': drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5_plane.c:272:26: error: 'fb' redeclared as different kind of symbol

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi, On 07/14/2015 08:22 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drm_bus.c: In function 'virtio_pci_kick_out_firmware_fb':

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:30:56AM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote: Hi, On 07/14/2015 08:22 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drm_bus.c: In function

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drm_bus.c: In function 'virtio_pci_kick_out_firmware_fb': drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drm_bus.c:55:2: error: implicit declaration of function

<    1   2