On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 12:04:32PM +0200, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:47:38 +0200
> Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > We need ww mutexes and need to rewrite i915 a bit fo fix this all.
> > I.e. known issue. As long as your userspace isn't nasty nothing bad
> > will ever happen though.
>
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:47:38 +0200
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> We need ww mutexes and need to rewrite i915 a bit fo fix this all.
> I.e. known issue. As long as your userspace isn't nasty nothing bad
> will ever happen though.
So do we already have a bug open with a good description of the issue?
Eve
We need ww mutexes and need to rewrite i915 a bit fo fix this all. I.e.
known issue. As long as your userspace isn't nasty nothing bad will ever
happen though.
-Daniel
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 08:40:33PM +0200, Marcin Ślusarz wrote:
> =
> [ INFO: possible
=
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
3.17.0 #50 Not tainted
-
Xorg/1170 is trying to acquire lock:
(&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: []
i915_gem_unmap_dma_buf+0x33/0xc0 [i915]
but task is already h
