On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 11:22:30AM GMT, Matt Roper wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 11:16:09AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Contrary to i915, in xe ADL-N is kept as a different platform, not a
subplatform of ADL-P. Since the display side doesn't need to
differentiate between P and N, i.e.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 11:16:09AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Contrary to i915, in xe ADL-N is kept as a different platform, not a
> subplatform of ADL-P. Since the display side doesn't need to
> differentiate between P and N, i.e. IS_ALDERLAKE_P_N() is never called,
> just fixup the compat
Contrary to i915, in xe ADL-N is kept as a different platform, not a
subplatform of ADL-P. Since the display side doesn't need to
differentiate between P and N, i.e. IS_ALDERLAKE_P_N() is never called,
just fixup the compat header to check for both P and N.
Moving ADL-N to be a subplatform would
