Re: [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: Implement vblank synchronized MBUS join changes

2024-04-02 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 03:15:02PM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote: > Quoting Ville Syrjala (2024-03-27 14:45:42-03:00) > >@@ -3663,24 +3659,42 @@ static void > >intel_dbuf_mdclk_min_tracker_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state > > intel_atomic_get_old_dbuf_state(state); > >

Re: [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: Implement vblank synchronized MBUS join changes

2024-03-29 Thread Gustavo Sousa
Quoting Ville Syrjala (2024-03-27 14:45:42-03:00) >From: Stanislav Lisovskiy > >Currently we can't change MBUS join status without doing a modeset, >because we are lacking mechanism to synchronize those with vblank. >However then this means that we can't do a fastset, if there is a need >to change

RE: [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: Implement vblank synchronized MBUS join changes

2024-03-28 Thread Shankar, Uma
> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Ville > Syrjala > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2024 11:16 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Ville Syrjälä > Subject: [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: Implement vblank synchronized MBUS join > changes >

[PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: Implement vblank synchronized MBUS join changes

2024-03-27 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Stanislav Lisovskiy Currently we can't change MBUS join status without doing a modeset, because we are lacking mechanism to synchronize those with vblank. However then this means that we can't do a fastset, if there is a need to change MBUS join state. Fix that by implementing such change.