Extract the "not-MST" stuff from intel_ddi_post_disable() so that
the whole thing isn't so cluttered.
The bigjoiner slave handling was outside of the !MST check,
but it really should have been inside it as its the counterpart
to the master handling inside the check. So we pull that
in as well.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 09:36:22PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> Thanks Stan for the cleanup around post disable non MST case, one comment
> below
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 5:11 AM Stanislav Lisovskiy
> wrote:
> >
> > Extract the "not-MST" stuff from intel_ddi_post_disable() so that
> > the
Thanks Stan for the cleanup around post disable non MST case, one comment below
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 5:11 AM Stanislav Lisovskiy
wrote:
>
> Extract the "not-MST" stuff from intel_ddi_post_disable() so that
> the whole thing isn't so cluttered.
>
> The bigjoiner slave handling was outside of
Extract the "not-MST" stuff from intel_ddi_post_disable() so that
the whole thing isn't so cluttered.
The bigjoiner slave handling was outside of the !MST check,
but it really should have been inside it as its the counterpart
to the master handling inside the check. So we pull that
in as well.
