[PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Utilize intel_crtc_joined_pipe_mask() more

2024-03-13 Thread Stanislav Lisovskiy
Unify the master vs. slave handling in intel_ddi_post_disable_hdmi_or_sst() by looping over all the pipes in one go. This also lets us move the intel_crtc_vblank_off() calls to happen in a consistent place vs. the transcoder disable. Previously we did the master vs. slaves on different sides of

Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Utilize intel_crtc_joined_pipe_mask() more

2024-03-12 Thread Manasi Navare
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 5:11 AM Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote: > > Unify the master vs. slave handling in > intel_ddi_post_disable_hdmi_or_sst() by looping over all the > pipes in one go. How will we handle looping through all joined pipes for MST case, does this need to be accounted for in the last

[PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Utilize intel_crtc_joined_pipe_mask() more

2024-03-08 Thread Stanislav Lisovskiy
Unify the master vs. slave handling in intel_ddi_post_disable_hdmi_or_sst() by looping over all the pipes in one go. This also lets us move the intel_crtc_vblank_off() calls to happen in a consistent place vs. the transcoder disable. Previously we did the master vs. slaves on different sides of