Re: [REBASE 5/7] drm/edid: avoid drm_edid_find_extension() internally

On Tue, 16 Apr 2024, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 16.04.24 um 11:19 schrieb Jani Nikula: >> Prefer the EDID iterators over drm_edid_find_extension() in >> drm_edid_has_cta_extension(), even if this leads to more code. The key >> is to use the same patterns as much as possible. > > Should t

Re: [REBASE 5/7] drm/edid: avoid drm_edid_find_extension() internally

Hi Am 16.04.24 um 11:19 schrieb Jani Nikula: Prefer the EDID iterators over drm_edid_find_extension() in drm_edid_has_cta_extension(), even if this leads to more code. The key is to use the same patterns as much as possible. Should this patch go before patch 4? That would limit the impact of t

[REBASE 5/7] drm/edid: avoid drm_edid_find_extension() internally

Prefer the EDID iterators over drm_edid_find_extension() in drm_edid_has_cta_extension(), even if this leads to more code. The key is to use the same patterns as much as possible. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 14 -- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 d