Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Tue, 22 May 2018, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 22 May 2018, vathsala nagaraju wrote: >> From: Vathsala Nagaraju >> >> For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for >> TP1,TP2,TP3

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Wed, 23 May 2018, "Nagaraju, Vathsala" wrote: > On 5/23/2018 3:33 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: >> Why did you send this again? Did you change something? I already >> reviewed the version from yesterday. > no code change, added only  rb tag by you and resent it. For

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On 5/23/2018 3:33 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: On Wed, 23 May 2018, vathsala nagaraju wrote: From: Vathsala Nagaraju For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Wed, 23 May 2018, vathsala nagaraju wrote: > From: Vathsala Nagaraju > > For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for > TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt > structure. Since

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Tue, 22 May 2018, vathsala nagaraju wrote: > From: Vathsala Nagaraju > > For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for > TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt > structure. Since

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On 5/22/2018 1:35 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: On Tue, 22 May 2018, "Nagaraju, Vathsala" wrote: On 5/18/2018 3:01 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: On Fri, 18 May 2018, vathsala nagaraju wrote: From: Vathsala Nagaraju

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Tue, 22 May 2018, "Nagaraju, Vathsala" wrote: > On 5/18/2018 3:01 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Fri, 18 May 2018, vathsala nagaraju wrote: >>> From: Vathsala Nagaraju >>> >>> For psr block #9, the vbt

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On 5/18/2018 3:01 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: On Fri, 18 May 2018, vathsala nagaraju wrote: From: Vathsala Nagaraju For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Fri, 18 May 2018, vathsala nagaraju wrote: > From: Vathsala Nagaraju > > For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for > TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt > structure. Since

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Thu, 2018-05-17 at 11:02 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2018, Dhinakaran Pandiyan om> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2018-05-16 at 11:08 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > > > > I think the patch is now the way it should be. We should not > > > change > > > our

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Wed, 16 May 2018, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > On Wed, 2018-05-16 at 11:08 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> I think the patch is now the way it should be. We should not change >> our interpretation based on the value. > > Is it correct to infer, from your response,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Wed, 2018-05-16 at 09:14 +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote: > On Wednesday 16 May 2018 04:33 AM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 09:02 +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote: > > > > > > From: Vathsala Nagaraju > > > > > > For psr block #9, the vbt

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Wed, 2018-05-16 at 11:08 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2018, vathsala nagaraju > wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 16 May 2018 04:33 AM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 09:02 +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote: > > > > > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Wed, 16 May 2018, vathsala nagaraju wrote: > On Wednesday 16 May 2018 04:33 AM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: >> On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 09:02 +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote: >>> From: Vathsala Nagaraju >>> >>> For psr block #9, the vbt

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Wed, 16 May 2018, vathsala nagaraju wrote: > On Wednesday 16 May 2018 04:33 AM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: >> On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 09:02 +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote: >>> From: Vathsala Nagaraju >>> >>> For psr block #9, the vbt

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Wednesday 16 May 2018 04:25 AM, Puthikorn Voravootivat wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 8:32 PM vathsala nagaraju < vathsala.nagar...@intel.com> wrote: From: Vathsala Nagaraju For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Wednesday 16 May 2018 04:33 AM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 09:02 +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote: From: Vathsala Nagaraju For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 8:32 PM vathsala nagaraju < vathsala.nagar...@intel.com> wrote: > From: Vathsala Nagaraju > For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for > TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 09:02 +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote: > From: Vathsala Nagaraju > > For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for > TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt > structure. Since spec does not  

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

FYI, Here is the the BDB version of the chip that need this change in Google Pixelbook. localhost ~ # uname -p Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7Y57 CPU @ 1.20GHz localhost ~ # dmesg | grep VBT.signature [0.298850] VBT signature "$VBT SKYLAKE", BDB version 211 localhost ~ # uname -p Intel(R)

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

Rodrigo, The changes are already in place on kabylake 209+ onwards, So limiting this change to only kabylake and confirmed vbt version for now. RCR is already raised for GOP team to resolve. Once we get the other platform confirmation, we can add those platforms too. Here is

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 05:06:09PM +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote: > From: Vathsala Nagaraju > > For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for > TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt > structure. Since spec does

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Thu, 03 May 2018, vathsala nagaraju wrote: > From: Vathsala Nagaraju > > For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for > TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt > structure. Since

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Wed, 02 May 2018, vathsala nagaraju wrote: > From: Vathsala Nagaraju > > For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for > TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt > structure. Since

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Wed, 02 May 2018, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 02:43:29PM +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote: >> From: Vathsala Nagaraju >> >> For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for >> TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Thursday 03 May 2018 02:45 AM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 02:43:29PM +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote: From: Vathsala Nagaraju For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 02:43:29PM +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote: > From: Vathsala Nagaraju > > For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for > TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt > structure. Since spec does

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, vathsala nagaraju wrote: > On Thursday 19 April 2018 07:05 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Thu, 19 Apr 2018, vathsala nagaraju wrote: >>> From: Vathsala Nagaraju >>> >>> For psr block #9,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Thursday 19 April 2018 07:05 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: On Thu, 19 Apr 2018, vathsala nagaraju wrote: From: Vathsala Nagaraju For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Thu, 19 Apr 2018, vathsala nagaraju wrote: > From: Vathsala Nagaraju > > For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for > TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt > structure. Since

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, vathsala nagaraju wrote: > From: Vathsala Nagaraju > > For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for > TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt > structure. Since

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Fri, 06 Apr 2018, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 10:58:51PM +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote: >> From: Vathsala Nagaraju >> >> For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for >> TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr

On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 10:58:51PM +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote: > From: Vathsala Nagaraju > > For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for > TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt > structure. Since spec does