Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't require dev-struct_mutex in psr_match_conditions

2014-08-04 5:46 GMT-03:00 Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch: Since I've reworked psr support to no longer require x-tiling we don't check any state protected by the Giant GEM Lock. So drop that check. Also boo for lockdep_assert_held for not yelling when lockdep is disabled. Cc: Paulo

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't require dev-struct_mutex in psr_match_conditions

On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 11:16:10AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: 2014-08-04 5:46 GMT-03:00 Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch: Since I've reworked psr support to no longer require x-tiling we don't check any state protected by the Giant GEM Lock. So drop that check. Also boo for