On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:54:13PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
830 is very unhappy of the watermark value is too low (indicating a very
high watermark in fact, ie. memory fetch will occur with an almost full
FIFO). Limit the
Am 08.09.2014 09:39, schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:54:13PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
830 is very unhappy of the watermark value is too low (indicating a very
high watermark in fact, ie. memory fetch will
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:03:11PM +0200, Thomas Richter wrote:
On 05.09.2014 20:54, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
830 is very unhappy of the watermark value is too low (indicating a very
high watermark in fact, ie. memory fetch
On 06.09.2014 19:33, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
The DVO 2x clock fix was missing. I posted a new version. But I think
that should only affect the DVO output and not the VGA output. Anyway on
my 830 nightly with those two patches is pretty damn good. I'm going to
assume this is the first time in
On 05.09.2014 20:54, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
830 is very unhappy of the watermark value is too low (indicating a very
high watermark in fact, ie. memory fetch will occur with an almost full
FIFO). Limit the watermark value to at
