Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Print error state times relative to capture

2018-05-02 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Chris Wilson writes: > Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2018-04-27 16:12:48) >> @@ -427,8 +428,10 @@ static void error_print_context(struct >> drm_i915_error_state_buf *m, >> } >> >> static void error_print_engine(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m, >> -

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Print error state times relative to capture

2018-04-27 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2018-04-27 16:12:48) > @@ -427,8 +428,10 @@ static void error_print_context(struct > drm_i915_error_state_buf *m, > } > > static void error_print_engine(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m, > - const struct drm_i915_error_engine *ee) > +

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Print error state times relative to capture

2018-04-16 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2018-04-16 14:40:52) > Using plain jiffies in error state output makes the output > time differences relative to the current system time. This > is wrong as it makes output time differences dependent > of when the error state is printed rather than when it is > captured. >