On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 01:44:12PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
+static void
+i915_gem_object_retire(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
+{
+ struct i915_gem_request *rq;
+ int i;
+
+ if (!obj-active)
+ return;
+
+ rq = obj-last_write.request;
+ if (rq
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 01:44:12PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
+static void i915_request_retire(struct i915_gem_request *rq)
{
- list_del(request-list);
- i915_gem_request_remove_from_client(request);
+ rq-completed = true;
+
+ list_del(rq-list);
+
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:29:53AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 01:44:12PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
@@ -3038,44 +3203,35 @@ out:
*/
int
i915_gem_object_sync(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
- struct intel_engine_cs *to)
+
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:41:26 +0200
Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:29:53AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 01:44:12PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
@@ -3038,44 +3203,35 @@ out:
*/
int
i915_gem_object_sync(struct
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 01:27:00PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
At the heart of this change is that the seqno is a too low level of an
abstraction to handle the growing complexities of command tracking, both
with the introduction of multiple command queues with execbuffer and the
potential for
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:27:00 +0100
Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
@@ -614,12 +615,12 @@ static int i915_gem_pageflip_info(struct
seq_file *m, void *data) seq_printf(m, Flip pending (waiting for
vsync) on pipe %c (plane %c)\n, pipe, plane);
}
-
