Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/31] drm/i915: Handle actual IPS enabled state.

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 06:20:00PM +, Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi Rodrigo, > > On 5 November 2015 at 18:49, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > With this we know if IPS is actually enabled. > > It might not be activated on BDW since Hardware take > > the decision and do its

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/31] drm/i915: Handle actual IPS enabled state.

Hi Rodrigo, On 5 November 2015 at 18:49, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > With this we know if IPS is actually enabled. > It might not be activated on BDW since Hardware take > the decision and do its transition. However we have > the visibility of the state on our driver what we

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/31] drm/i915: Handle actual IPS enabled state.

Hi, On 13 November 2015 at 18:38, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 06:20:00PM +, Daniel Stone wrote: >> Maybe that's not the best approach, but I think we need to find a way >> to take the synchronous vblank wait out of the modeset path. Using a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/31] drm/i915: Handle actual IPS enabled state.

On 13 November 2015 at 20:28, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 06:55:18PM +, Daniel Stone wrote: >> On 13 November 2015 at 18:38, Ville Syrjälä >> wrote: >> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 06:20:00PM +, Daniel Stone

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/31] drm/i915: Handle actual IPS enabled state.

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 06:55:18PM +, Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi, > > On 13 November 2015 at 18:38, Ville Syrjälä > wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 06:20:00PM +, Daniel Stone wrote: > >> Maybe that's not the best approach, but I think we need to find a way

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/31] drm/i915: Handle actual IPS enabled state.

Hi, On 5 November 2015 at 18:49, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > +void intel_ips_init(struct drm_i915_private dev_priv) That would be *dev_priv. Cheers, Daniel ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org