> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 9:28 AM
> To: Daniel Vetter ; Dave Airlie
> Cc: intel-gfx ; stable
> ; Gustavo Padovan
> ; Tang, CQ ; dri-
> devel ; Vetter, Daniel
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm: Restore driver.preclose() for all to use
>
>
Quoting Daniel Vetter (2020-07-27 20:32:45)
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 7:21 PM Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > An unfortunate sequence of events, but it turns out there is a valid
> > usecase for being able to free/decouple the driver objects before they
> > are freed by the DRM core. In particular,
Hi
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: 4.12+
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.7.10, v5.4.53, v4.19.134, v4.14.189.
v5.7.10: Build OK!
v5.4.53: Build OK!
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Vetter
> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 12:33 PM
> To: Chris Wilson ; Dave Airlie
> Cc: intel-gfx ; stable
> ; Gustavo Padovan
> ; Tang, CQ ; dri-
> devel ; Vetter, Daniel
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm: Restore driver.preclose() for all to use
>
>
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 7:21 PM Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> An unfortunate sequence of events, but it turns out there is a valid
> usecase for being able to free/decouple the driver objects before they
> are freed by the DRM core. In particular, if we have a pointer into a
> drm core object from
