Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] x86/early-quirks: Extend Intel graphics stolen memory placement to 64bit

2017-12-08 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Matthew, On Thu, 7 Dec 2017, Matthew Auld wrote: Can you please add a version number to your patches? Having the same subject line five times is just annoying. > From: Joonas Lahtinen > To give upcoming SKU BIOSes more flexibility in placing the Intel >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] x86/early-quirks: Extend Intel graphics stolen memory placement to 64bit

2017-11-27 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 22:05 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Matthew Auld (2017-11-24 21:29:22) > > From: Joonas Lahtinen > > > > In preparation for upcoming SKUs, allow more freedom in placement > > of the Intel graphics stolen memory by BIOS to full 64bit

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] x86/early-quirks: Extend Intel graphics stolen memory placement to 64bit

2017-11-27 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On Sat, 2017-11-25 at 00:48 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 24 Nov 2017, Matthew Auld wrote: > > > From: Joonas Lahtinen > > Please CC the linux kernel mailinglist on patches related to x86. The > MAINTAINERS file says: > > X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] x86/early-quirks: Extend Intel graphics stolen memory placement to 64bit

2017-11-24 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017, Matthew Auld wrote: > From: Joonas Lahtinen Please CC the linux kernel mailinglist on patches related to x86. The MAINTAINERS file says: X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT) M: Thomas Gleixner M: Ingo Molnar

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] x86/early-quirks: Extend Intel graphics stolen memory placement to 64bit

2017-11-24 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Matthew Auld (2017-11-24 21:29:22) > From: Joonas Lahtinen > > In preparation for upcoming SKUs, allow more freedom in placement > of the Intel graphics stolen memory by BIOS to full 64bit range. > > v2: export the stolen region as a resource > fix