Hi,
On 07/09/2018 08:14 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 08:32:16AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Any kind of hack that involves reading out the hardware state should go
into something like intel_sanitize_encoder(). Actually by that time we
have already read out the hw state,
On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 08:32:16AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/06/2018 04:16 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:18:27PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> On BYT and CHT the GOP sometimes initializes the pclk at a (slightly)
> >> different frequency then the
Hi,
On 07/09/2018 07:37 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 08:32:16AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 07/06/2018 04:16 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:18:27PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
On BYT and CHT the GOP sometimes initializes the pclk at a
On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 08:32:16AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/06/2018 04:16 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:18:27PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > On BYT and CHT the GOP sometimes initializes the pclk at a (slightly)
> > > different frequency then the
Hi,
On 07/06/2018 04:16 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:18:27PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
On BYT and CHT the GOP sometimes initializes the pclk at a (slightly)
different frequency then the pclk which we've calculated.
This commit makes the DSI code read-back the pclk set
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:18:27PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On BYT and CHT the GOP sometimes initializes the pclk at a (slightly)
> different frequency then the pclk which we've calculated.
>
> This commit makes the DSI code read-back the pclk set by the GOP and
> if that is within a
