Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm: Resurrect atomic rmfb code, v2

2017-02-09 Thread Sinclair Yeh
I've verified that it doesn't break our existing code, but I'm in the process of rebasing my atomic enabling patch series onto drm-next along with this. I should be able to get this done by tomorrow morning. From: Maarten Lankhorst

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm: Resurrect atomic rmfb code, v2

2017-02-09 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 26-01-17 om 19:39 schreef Sinclair Yeh: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:55:51AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 25-01-17 om 19:05 schreef Sinclair Yeh: >>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 09:36:36AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: Op 25-01-17 om 09:09 schreef Thomas Hellstrom: > On

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm: Resurrect atomic rmfb code, v2

2017-01-26 Thread Sinclair Yeh
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:55:51AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 25-01-17 om 19:05 schreef Sinclair Yeh: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 09:36:36AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> Op 25-01-17 om 09:09 schreef Thomas Hellstrom: > >>> On 01/25/2017 05:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm: Resurrect atomic rmfb code, v2

2017-01-26 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 25-01-17 om 19:05 schreef Sinclair Yeh: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 09:36:36AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 25-01-17 om 09:09 schreef Thomas Hellstrom: >>> On 01/25/2017 05:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 01:44:54PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm: Resurrect atomic rmfb code, v2

2017-01-25 Thread Sinclair Yeh
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 09:36:36AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 25-01-17 om 09:09 schreef Thomas Hellstrom: > > On 01/25/2017 05:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 01:44:54PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 05:15:47PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm: Resurrect atomic rmfb code, v2

2017-01-25 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 25-01-17 om 09:09 schreef Thomas Hellstrom: > On 01/25/2017 05:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 01:44:54PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 05:15:47PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:29:45PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm: Resurrect atomic rmfb code, v2

2017-01-25 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
On 01/25/2017 05:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 01:44:54PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 05:15:47PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:29:45PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: From: Daniel Vetter

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm: Resurrect atomic rmfb code, v2

2017-01-24 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 01:44:54PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 05:15:47PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:29:45PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > > From: Daniel Vetter > > > > > > This was somehow lost between v3 and

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm: Resurrect atomic rmfb code, v2

2017-01-24 Thread Matt Roper
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 05:15:47PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:29:45PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > From: Daniel Vetter > > > > This was somehow lost between v3 and the merged version in Maarten's > > patch merged as: > > > > commit

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm: Resurrect atomic rmfb code, v2

2017-01-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:29:45PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > From: Daniel Vetter > > This was somehow lost between v3 and the merged version in Maarten's > patch merged as: > > commit f2d580b9a8149735cbc4b59c4a8df60173658140 > Author: Maarten Lankhorst