On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
I think it would be better to refactor drm_wait_vblank() than to
reinvent it.
That's the ioctl implementation which spends most of its time decoding
ioctl structures. If we take that out then there's about half a line
On 31.07.2014 16:54, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
I think it would be better to refactor drm_wait_vblank() than to
reinvent it.
That's the ioctl implementation which spends most of its time decoding
ioctl structures. If we
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On 31.07.2014 16:54, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
I think it would be better to refactor drm_wait_vblank() than to
reinvent it.
That's the ioctl
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:59:33AM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 30.07.2014 06:32, Daniel Vetter wrote:
As usual in both a crtc index and a struct drm_crtc * version.
The function assumes that no one drivers their display below 10Hz, and
it will complain if the vblank wait takes longer
On 30.07.2014 17:22, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:59:33AM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 30.07.2014 06:32, Daniel Vetter wrote:
+ * due to lack of driver support or because the crtc is off.
+ */
+void drm_crtc_vblank_wait(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
+{
+
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:32:28PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 30.07.2014 17:22, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:59:33AM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 30.07.2014 06:32, Daniel Vetter wrote:
+ * due to lack of driver support or because the crtc is off.
+ */
+void
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:32:22PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
[...]
+ ret = wait_event_timeout(dev-vblank[crtc].queue,
+ C, msecs_to_jiffies(100));
100 milliseconds looks like a very
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 04:20:25PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:32:28PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 30.07.2014 17:22, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:59:33AM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 30.07.2014 06:32, Daniel Vetter wrote:
+ * due to
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 04:24:06PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:32:22PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
[...]
+ ret = wait_event_timeout(dev-vblank[crtc].queue,
+
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:36:21PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 04:20:25PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:32:28PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 30.07.2014 17:22, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:59:33AM +0900, Michel Dänzer
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:06:38PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 04:24:06PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:32:22PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
[...]
+ ret =
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:36:21PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 04:20:25PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:32:28PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 30.07.2014 17:22, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:59:33AM +0900, Michel Dänzer
On 31.07.2014 00:21, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:36:21PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 04:20:25PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:32:28PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 30.07.2014 17:22, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30,
On 30.07.2014 06:32, Daniel Vetter wrote:
As usual in both a crtc index and a struct drm_crtc * version.
The function assumes that no one drivers their display below 10Hz, and
it will complain if the vblank wait takes longer than that.
v2: Also check dev-max_vblank_counter since some
14 matches
Mail list logo
