On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 12:37 +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ma, 2016-08-15 at 09:26 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 15:34 +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > No idea yet why we would need to limit for rcs only.
> > >
> > I went back and forth; I think I
On ma, 2016-08-15 at 09:26 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 15:34 +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> >
> > No idea yet why we would need to limit for rcs only.
> >
> I went back and forth; I think I did test on the BLT ring and maybe one
> of the video rings and things worked on at
On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 15:34 +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Chris Wilson writes:
>
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:48:06PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Jesse Barnes
> > >
> > > We just need to pass in an address to execute
Chris Wilson writes:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:48:06PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
>> From: Jesse Barnes
>>
>> We just need to pass in an address to execute and some flags, since we
>> don't have to worry about buffer relocation or any of
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:48:06PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> From: Jesse Barnes
>
> We just need to pass in an address to execute and some flags, since we
> don't have to worry about buffer relocation or any of the other usual
> stuff. Returns a fence to be used