Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] lib: Align ring measurement to timer

2018-05-31 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2018-05-31 15:42:03) > > > On 30/05/18 12:52, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2018-05-30 18:30:36) > >> > >> > >> On 30/05/18 03:33, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>> After hitting the SIGINT from execbuf, wait until the next timer signal > >>> before

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] lib: Align ring measurement to timer

2018-05-31 Thread Antonio Argenziano
On 30/05/18 12:52, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2018-05-30 18:30:36) On 30/05/18 03:33, Chris Wilson wrote: After hitting the SIGINT from execbuf, wait until the next timer signal before trying again. This aligns the start of the ioctl to the timer, hopefully maximising

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] lib: Align ring measurement to timer

2018-05-30 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2018-05-30 18:30:36) > > > On 30/05/18 03:33, Chris Wilson wrote: > > After hitting the SIGINT from execbuf, wait until the next timer signal > > before trying again. This aligns the start of the ioctl to the timer, > > hopefully maximising the amount of time we have

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] lib: Align ring measurement to timer

2018-05-30 Thread Antonio Argenziano
On 30/05/18 03:33, Chris Wilson wrote: After hitting the SIGINT from execbuf, wait until the next timer signal before trying again. This aligns the start of the ioctl to the timer, hopefully maximising the amount of time we have for processing before the next signal -- trying to prevent the