On 24/05/2023 13:30, Andi Shyti wrote:
Hi again,
finally... pushed in drm-intel-gt-next! :)
I had to revert this (uapi commit only) by force pushing, luckily it was the
top commit.
OK, sorry!
1)
IGT is not merged yet.
if igt is merged without the kernel it would fail, though.
can we
On 24/05/2023 13:19, Andi Shyti wrote:
Hi Tvrtko,
finally... pushed in drm-intel-gt-next! :)
I had to revert this (uapi commit only) by force pushing, luckily it was the
top commit.
OK, sorry!
1)
IGT is not merged yet.
if igt is merged without the kernel it would fail, though.
Ideal
Hi again,
> > > finally... pushed in drm-intel-gt-next! :)
> >
> > I had to revert this (uapi commit only) by force pushing, luckily it was the
> > top commit.
>
> OK, sorry!
>
> > 1)
> > IGT is not merged yet.
>
> if igt is merged without the kernel it would fail, though.
can we at least agr
Hi Tvrtko,
> > finally... pushed in drm-intel-gt-next! :)
>
> I had to revert this (uapi commit only) by force pushing, luckily it was the
> top commit.
OK, sorry!
> 1)
> IGT is not merged yet.
if igt is merged without the kernel it would fail, though.
> 2)
> The tools/include/uapi/drm/i915_d
On 24/05/2023 12:56, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 23/05/2023 09:37, Andi Shyti wrote:
Hi Fei,
finally... pushed in drm-intel-gt-next! :)
I had to revert this (uapi commit only) by force pushing, luckily it was
the top commit.
1)
IGT is not merged yet.
2)
The tools/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm
On 23/05/2023 09:37, Andi Shyti wrote:
Hi Fei,
finally... pushed in drm-intel-gt-next! :)
I had to revert this (uapi commit only) by force pushing, luckily it was
the top commit.
1)
IGT is not merged yet.
2)
The tools/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h part of the patch was not removed.
Please
Hi Fei,
finally... pushed in drm-intel-gt-next! :)
Andi
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 10:11:01PM -0700, fei.y...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Fei Yang
>
> This series introduce a new extension for GEM_CREATE,
> 1. end support for set caching ioctl [PATCH 1/2]
> 2. add set_pat extension for gem_create [P
