> > > > Add pci (device info) tags for if GuC TLB Invalidation is enabled.
> > > > Since GuC based TLB invalidation is only strictly necessary for MTL
> > > > resently, only enable GuC based TLB invalidations for MTL.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt
> > > Jani was mentioning that t
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 09:24:12PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> > > > Add pci (device info) tags for if GuC TLB Invalidation is enabled.
> > > > Since GuC based TLB invalidation is only strictly necessary for MTL
> > > > resently, only enable GuC based TLB invalidations for MTL.
> > > >
Hi John,
> > > Add pci (device info) tags for if GuC TLB Invalidation is enabled.
> > > Since GuC based TLB invalidation is only strictly necessary for MTL
> > > resently, only enable GuC based TLB invalidations for MTL.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt
> > Jani was mentioning that the
On 10/4/2023 12:03, Andi Shyti wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:36:22AM -0700, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
Add pci (device info) tags for if GuC TLB Invalidation is enabled.
Since GuC based TLB invalidation is only strictly necessary for MTL
resently, only enable GuC based TLB invalida
Why is there no cover letter for this patch series?
It is at v5 but there is no history of what has changed from one version
to the next. That makes it much harder to review.
John.
On 10/4/2023 11:36, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
Add pci (device info) tags for if GuC TLB Invalidation is enabled.
Hi Jonathan,
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:36:22AM -0700, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
> Add pci (device info) tags for if GuC TLB Invalidation is enabled.
> Since GuC based TLB invalidation is only strictly necessary for MTL
> resently, only enable GuC based TLB invalidations for MTL.
>
> Signed-off-by:
