On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 01:08:13PM +0200, Mika Kahola wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 18:53 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 06:44:09PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 01:21:24PM +0200, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > > > Don't use DP link training
On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 18:44 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 01:21:24PM +0200, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > Don't use DP link training optimization if channel EQ is not ok. It has
> > been reported that in case of failure in channel EQ check the link training
> > optimization can be
On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 18:53 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 06:44:09PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 01:21:24PM +0200, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > > Don't use DP link training optimization if channel EQ is not ok. It has
> > > been reported that in case
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 06:44:09PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 01:21:24PM +0200, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > Don't use DP link training optimization if channel EQ is not ok. It has
> > been reported that in case of failure in channel EQ check the link training
> > optimization
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 01:21:24PM +0200, Mika Kahola wrote:
> Don't use DP link training optimization if channel EQ is not ok. It has
> been reported that in case of failure in channel EQ check the link training
> optimization can be enabled and therefore may not be able to reuse the
> previously
