Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 17/44] drm/i915: Prelude to splitting i915_gem_do_execbuffer in two

2014-07-23 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 05:33:42PM +0100, John Harrison wrote: On 07/07/2014 20:21, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 11:34:23AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:24:08 +0100 john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: From: John Harrison john.c.harri...@intel.com The

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 17/44] drm/i915: Prelude to splitting i915_gem_do_execbuffer in two

2014-07-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 11:34:23AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:24:08 +0100 john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: From: John Harrison john.c.harri...@intel.com The scheduler decouples the submission of batch buffers to the driver with their submission to the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 17/44] drm/i915: Prelude to splitting i915_gem_do_execbuffer in two

2014-07-02 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:24:08 +0100 john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: From: John Harrison john.c.harri...@intel.com The scheduler decouples the submission of batch buffers to the driver with their submission to the hardware. This basically means splitting the execbuffer() function in half.