Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 3/5] drm/i915: split out virtual engine code

2019-12-11 Thread Matthew Brost
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 01:34:20PM -0800, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: On 12/11/19 1:22 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2019-12-11 21:12:42) Having the virtual engine handling in its own file will make it easier call it from or modify for the GuC implementation

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 3/5] drm/i915: split out virtual engine code

2019-12-11 Thread Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
On 12/11/19 1:22 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2019-12-11 21:12:42) Having the virtual engine handling in its own file will make it easier call it from or modify for the GuC implementation without leaking the changes in the context management or execlists submission

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 3/5] drm/i915: split out virtual engine code

2019-12-11 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2019-12-11 21:12:42) > Having the virtual engine handling in its own file will make it easier > call it from or modify for the GuC implementation without leaking the > changes in the context management or execlists submission paths. No. The virtual engine is