Hi,
On 2023-01-30 at 11:04:07 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 27/01/2023 16:17, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> > Hi Tvrtko,
> >
> > On 2023-01-27 at 11:12:41 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin
> > >
> > > Now that DRM subsystem can contain PCI cards with the vendor set to
On 27/01/2023 16:17, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
Hi Tvrtko,
On 2023-01-27 at 11:12:41 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Now that DRM subsystem can contain PCI cards with the vendor set to Intel
but they are not Intel GPUs, we need a better selection logic than looking
at the
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:53:38AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 27/01/2023 11:39, Petri Latvala wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:12:41AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin
> > >
> > > Now that DRM subsystem can contain PCI cards with the vendor set to Intel
> >
On 27/01/2023 11:39, Petri Latvala wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:12:41AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Now that DRM subsystem can contain PCI cards with the vendor set to Intel
but they are not Intel GPUs, we need a better selection logic than looking
at the vendor.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:12:41AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> Now that DRM subsystem can contain PCI cards with the vendor set to Intel
> but they are not Intel GPUs, we need a better selection logic than looking
> at the vendor. Use the driver name instead.
>
>
