Re: [Intel-gfx] Prevent trivial oom from gem_exec_nop/sequential

2018-01-16 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-01-16 09:52:10) > > On 15/01/2018 21:24, Chris Wilson wrote: > > About the third resend of this series that tries to curtail the prolonged > > reference lifetimes of fences via the signaler thread when the CPUs are > > saturated by interrupts. > > Happens on CI,

Re: [Intel-gfx] Prevent trivial oom from gem_exec_nop/sequential

2018-01-16 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-01-16 09:52:10) > > On 15/01/2018 21:24, Chris Wilson wrote: > > About the third resend of this series that tries to curtail the prolonged > > reference lifetimes of fences via the signaler thread when the CPUs are > > saturated by interrupts. > > Happens on CI,

Re: [Intel-gfx] Prevent trivial oom from gem_exec_nop/sequential

2018-01-16 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 15/01/2018 21:24, Chris Wilson wrote: About the third resend of this series that tries to curtail the prolonged reference lifetimes of fences via the signaler thread when the CPUs are saturated by interrupts. Happens on CI, regularly, occasionally? In the real-world it shouldnt right?