Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On 2023-11-26 18:38, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c:21:41: error: > 'DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_MIN' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:27:49 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:22:09 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c:

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 12:27:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:22:09 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:22:09 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c: In function 'dp_altmode_vdm': >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Qiang, On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 16:51:27 +0800 Qiang Yu wrote: > > I think you can just revert the following three lima commits when merge: > * 4a66f3da99dc ("drm/lima: add show_fdinfo for drm usage stats") > * 87767de835ed ("drm/lima: allocate unique id per drm_file") > * bccafec957a5 ("drm/lima:

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

I think you can just revert the following three lima commits when merge: * 4a66f3da99dc ("drm/lima: add show_fdinfo for drm usage stats") * 87767de835ed ("drm/lima: allocate unique id per drm_file") * bccafec957a5 ("drm/lima: add usage counting method to ctx_mgr") Regards, Qiang On Mon, Apr 3,

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Am 23.11.22 um 06:35 schrieb David Airlie: On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 3:21 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 18:32:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this: ld:

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Dave, On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 15:35:50 +1000 David Airlie wrote: > > Nothing gone wrong as such, just the drm-misc-next pull request was > sent on a regular weekly cadence, then I merged it a few days later. > The fix for this is still in the drm-misc-next queue for the next PR > which I will get

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 3:21 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 18:32:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > > ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this: > > > > ld: drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmon.o:

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 18:32:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this: > > ld: drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmon.o: in function `fb_modesetting_disabled': > fbmon.c:(.text+0x1e4): multiple

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 11:02 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c: In function > 'nouveau_display_create': >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:04:51AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 10:48:17 +0300 Ville Syrjälä > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:36:56PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 10:48:17 +0300 Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:36:56PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_disp.c: In

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:36:56PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_disp.c: In function 'zynqmp_disp_create_planes': >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hello Stephen, On 6/10/22 06:49, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/firmware/efi/sysfb_efi.c:29:10: fatal error: asm/efi.h: No such file > or directory >29 | #include >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, 09 Nov 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 09:40:08AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Sat, 06 Nov 2021, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> > Hi Jani, >> > >> > On Fri, 05 Nov 2021 13:03:43 +0200 Jani Nikula >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> I probably should have pushed c4f08d7246a5

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 09:40:08AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Sat, 06 Nov 2021, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Jani, > > > > On Fri, 05 Nov 2021 13:03:43 +0200 Jani Nikula > > wrote: > >> > >> I probably should have pushed c4f08d7246a5 ("drm/locking: fix > >> __stack_depot_* name conflict")

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Sat, 06 Nov 2021, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Jani, > > On Fri, 05 Nov 2021 13:03:43 +0200 Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> I probably should have pushed c4f08d7246a5 ("drm/locking: fix >> __stack_depot_* name conflict") to drm-misc-next-fixes. > > Please do so as builds will start failing otherwise

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Jani, On Fri, 05 Nov 2021 13:03:43 +0200 Jani Nikula wrote: > > I probably should have pushed c4f08d7246a5 ("drm/locking: fix > __stack_depot_* name conflict") to drm-misc-next-fixes. Please do so as builds will start failing otherwise :-( -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell pgpa2iVfhrIzA.pgp

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi, On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 01:03:43PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 05 Nov 2021, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:42:23 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 20:26:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > After

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Fri, 05 Nov 2021, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:42:23 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> >> On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 20:26:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >> > >> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm >> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:42:23 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 20:26:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm > > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 20:26:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modeset_lock.c:111:29: error: conflicting types for > '__stack_depot_save' > 111 | static

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Jani, On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 12:56:58 +0300 Jani Nikula wrote: > > The fix looks good, but I'd rename __stack_depot_print too added in the > same commit. Do you want to respin or shall I take it from here? If you are happy to take it on, then thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Fri, 15 Oct 2021, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modeset_lock.c:111:29: error: conflicting types for > '__stack_depot_save' > 111 | static

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi, I review the code. It seems I forget to delete the definition of the variable "inst",I'm sry for that.: ( I'll submit another patch soon. > Hi all,> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64> > allmodconfig) failed like this:> > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 5:02 AM wrote: > > Hi, > > I review the code. > > It seems I forget to delete the definition of the variable "inst",I'm sry for > that.: ( > > I'll submit another patch soon. > I already wrote the patch and pushed it:

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

uhh, that's on me. I will send out a patch today. I just noticed that the config file I used for testing had WERROR disabled. On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 4:18 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 09:11:57AM +0200, Christian König wrote: > Am 08.06.21 um 09:06 schrieb Felix Kuehling: > > Am 2021-06-08 um 2:55 a.m. schrieb Christian König: > > > Hi Felix, > > > > > > that should already be fixed in drm-tip as part of the merge of the > > > TTM changes. > > No, the

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Am 08.06.21 um 09:06 schrieb Felix Kuehling: Am 2021-06-08 um 2:55 a.m. schrieb Christian König: Hi Felix, that should already be fixed in drm-tip as part of the merge of the TTM changes. No, the preempt_mgr doesn't exist in drm-misc-next. It does exist in drm-next, but that doesn't seem to

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Am 2021-06-08 um 2:55 a.m. schrieb Christian König: > Hi Felix, > > that should already be fixed in drm-tip as part of the merge of the > TTM changes. No, the preempt_mgr doesn't exist in drm-misc-next. It does exist in drm-next, but that doesn't seem to have the TTM changes yet. Is there

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Felix, that should already be fixed in drm-tip as part of the merge of the TTM changes. Regards, Christian. Am 08.06.21 um 07:37 schrieb Felix Kuehling: Hi Christian, I based amdgpu_preempt_mgr on amdgpu_gtt_mgr and now I'm looking at what changed there. Looks like I'll need to create a

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Christian, I based amdgpu_preempt_mgr on amdgpu_gtt_mgr and now I'm looking at what changed there. Looks like I'll need to create a dummy node in amdgpu_preempt_mgr_new to satisfy TTM, and free it in amdgpu_preempt_mgr_del. Thanks,   Felix Am 2021-06-07 um 10:50 p.m. schrieb Stephen

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Ah, yes. I've forgot to include the infiniband subdir in the automated rename. I should have done that treewide. Going to provide a fix in a minute, sorry for the noise. Christian. Am 07.06.21 um 04:33 schrieb Stephen Rothwell: Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Am 12.05.21 um 07:00 schrieb Stephen Rothwell: Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c: In function 'nouveau_connector_of_detect':

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Op 2021-02-10 om 04:11 schreef Stephen Rothwell: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_sched.c:263:1: error: return type is an incomplete > type > 263 | v3d_gpu_reset_for_timeout(struct

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Am 14.01.21 um 01:31 schrieb Stephen Rothwell: Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c: In function 'drm_need_swiotlb': drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c:202:6: error: implicit declaration of

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 05:10:15PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 05:19:06 -0500 "Michael S. Tsirkin" > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 12:43:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Michael, On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 05:19:06 -0500 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 12:43:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm > > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > > > In file included from

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > --- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h > > +++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h > > @@ -5,6 +5,9 @@ > > #include > > #include > > #include > > +#ifndef CONFIG_SWIOTLB > > +#include > > +#endif No conditional includes please. And the

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:27:11AM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > --- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h > > > @@ -5,6 +5,9 @@ > > > #include > > > #include > > > #include > > > +#ifndef

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 11:23 AM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 2:43 AM Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 2:43 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm > > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > > > In file included from

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 12:43:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c:26: > include/linux/swiotlb.h: In function

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 2:43 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c:26: > include/linux/swiotlb.h: In function

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Am 30.10.20 um 01:07 schrieb Stephen Rothwell: Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c: In function 'nouveau_ttm_init': drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c:320:19: error: implicit

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Stephen, Le lun. 12 oct. 2020 à 15:24, Stephen Rothwell a écrit : Hi all, On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:42:02 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:09:03 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig)

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Stephen, Le lun. 12 oct. 2020 à 15:24, Stephen Rothwell a écrit : Hi all, On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:42:02 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:09:03 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig)

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, [Just adding Dave to cc's] On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 15:24:52 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:42:02 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:09:03 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree,

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:42:02 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:09:03 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from include/linux/clk.h:13,

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:09:03 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: In file included from include/linux/clk.h:13, from drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c:10:

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 10:55:47 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_display.c: In function > 'qxl_display_read_client_monitors_config': >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Dave, On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:47:49 +1000 Dave Airlie wrote: > > My bad, my local builds passed, as I had made the change but forgot > the commit --amend > > Pushed out a new head with it in it now. Excellent, thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell pgpiTA7UkNPQK.pgp Description: OpenPGP

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 11:36, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:59:29 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:59:29 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c: In function > 'amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of_gpu': >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Stephen, On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 08:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 08:33:24 +0200 Thomas Zimmermann > wrote: > > > > We recently dropped the _unlock() suffix from drm_gem_object_put(). This > > patch should be ok. > > Yes, but what it shows is that the

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Thomas, On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 08:33:24 +0200 Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > We recently dropped the _unlock() suffix from drm_gem_object_put(). This > patch should be ok. Yes, but what it shows is that the drm-misc tree is still based on v5.7-rc1 and v5.8-rc1 has about 16000 more commits for

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Am 17.06.20 um 02:59 schrieb Stephen Rothwell: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c: In function > 'amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of_gpu': >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On 4/29/20 10:09 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > On 4/29/20 12:33 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:01:18 +1000 Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> >>> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc >>> allyesconfig)

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Stephen, On 4/29/20 12:33 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:01:18 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> >> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc >> allyesconfig) failed like this: >> >> drivers/video/fbdev/controlfb.c: In function

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:01:18 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/video/fbdev/controlfb.c: In function 'controlfb_mmap': > drivers/video/fbdev/controlfb.c:756:23: error:

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 9:22 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:19:37 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:23:31PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Daniel, On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:19:37 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:23:31PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:23:31PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c: In function > 'anx6345_i2c_probe': >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Applied. Thanks! Alex On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 8:22 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_tmz.c:23:10: fatal error: drm/drmP.h: No > such file or

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, This is now a semantic conflict between the drm and v4l-dvb trees. On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:30:45 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/media/platform/cec-gpio/cec-gpio.c: In function

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Applied. thanks! Alex On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 8:36 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdkfd/kfd_module.c:25: >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:30:45 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > Sorry, forgot to include the error messages. But they shuld be clear from the fix ... -- Cheers, Stephen

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

> I applied the following fix patch: > > From: Stephen Rothwell > Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 18:37:40 +1000 > Subject: [PATCH] drm/virtio: module_param_named() requires linux/moduleparam.h > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c | 2 ++ > 1 file

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 06:08:55PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Gerd, > > > >drm_fb_memcpy_dstclip(__io_virt(cirrus->vram), > > > ^ > > > __do_irq > > > > Probably just a missing arm/io.h include. > > I assume you meant

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Gerd, On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:22:18 +0200 Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:08:49PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:08:49PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/cirrus/cirrus.c: In function 'cirrus_fb_blit_rect': > drivers/gpu/drm/cirrus/cirrus.c:310:25:

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Dave, On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 15:55:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > kernel/dma/contiguous.c:19:10: fatal error: asm/dma-contiguous.h: No such > file or directory > #include >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:56:08PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:26 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote: > > > Thanks, patch is: > > > Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu > > > > This looks like a fairly naive conversion from the old

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:26 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote: > > Thanks, patch is: > > Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu > > This looks like a fairly naive conversion from the old IDR API to the > XArray API. You should be able to remove mgr->lock

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:21 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 10:50:06AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c > > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ int lima_ctx_create(struct lima_device *dev, struct > > lima_ctx_mgr *mgr, u32 *id) > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote: > Thanks, patch is: > Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu This looks like a fairly naive conversion from the old IDR API to the XArray API. You should be able to remove mgr->lock entirely, relying on the xa_lock for synchronising free and get. If you

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 10:50:06AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ int lima_ctx_create(struct lima_device *dev, struct > lima_ctx_mgr *mgr, u32 *id) > goto err_out0; > } > > - err = xa_alloc(>handles, id,

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 04:59:37PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:57 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote: > > > Thanks, patch is: > > > Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu > > > > Good time to get started with committing patches? In

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:57 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote: > > Thanks, patch is: > > Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu > > Good time to get started with committing patches? In general it's kinda > confusing if the maintainer r-bs a patch, but doesn't

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote: > Thanks, patch is: > Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu Good time to get started with committing patches? In general it's kinda confusing if the maintainer r-bs a patch, but doesn't say whether/when/how it gets merged. Big chance the patch will get

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Thanks, patch is: Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu Regards, Qiang On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:50 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:7, >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Daniel/Stephen Thanks for the report and the hints how to move forward to fix it. > Sam, can you pls take a look at what komeda needs? you need to > manually merge together drm-misc-next and drm-next first I think. Merged the two tree and fixed build. Undid the merge and checked that the

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 2:38 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_drv.c:13: >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Daniel, On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 09:37:22 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-tip/tree/fixups/drm-misc-next.patch?h=rerere-cache > > is the fixup you want. Should get baked into drm-next any moment, since > the first drm-misc-next pull is already out. I added that

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On 1/8/19 3:37 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 11:12:41AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 >> allmodconfig) failed like this: >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c: In

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 11:12:41AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c: In function > 'amdgpu_dm_mode_config_init': >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Stephen, yeah, that is a known problem. I missed the change during rebase of the revert. Please see patch "2312f9842854 drm/v3d: fix broken build" which is already in drm-misc-next and fixes the issue. Christian. Am 06.12.18 um 03:32 schrieb Stephen Rothwell: > Hi all, > > After merging

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Rodrigo, On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 17:21:54 -0800 Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > I had just written the email for you about this. > Feel free to ignore that one since you already found the solution > and sorry for the delay on warning you. And I should read all my email before

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 01:00:15AM +, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, Hi Stephen, I had just written the email for you about this. Feel free to ignore that one since you already found the solution and sorry for the delay on warning you. > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 10:24:41AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 2:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:24:49 +0200 Daniel Vetter > > wrote: > >> > >> How are we going to handle

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 2:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:24:49 +0200 Daniel Vetter > wrote: >> >> How are we going to handle this now? The refactor is deeply burried in >> drm-misc, I guess you could

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Daniel, On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:24:49 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: > > How are we going to handle this now? The refactor is deeply burried in > drm-misc, I guess you could cherry-pick the relevant patches over. But > that'll probably lead to more conflicts because git

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi, On 21-07-17 09:24, Daniel Vetter wrote: Hi Greg, How are we going to handle this now? The refactor is deeply burried in drm-misc, I guess you could cherry-pick the relevant patches over. But that'll probably lead to more conflicts because git will get confused. Or you could just delete

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Greg, How are we going to handle this now? The refactor is deeply burried in drm-misc, I guess you could cherry-pick the relevant patches over. But that'll probably lead to more conflicts because git will get confused. Or you could just delete the set_busid hook in -staging, which renders the

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Dave, The following is now applicable to the drm and staging.current trees ... On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:46:57 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:10:14 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/tee/tee_shm.c:87:2: error: unknown field 'kmap_atomic' specified in > initializer >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> On Tue, 2 May 2017 10:25:18 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> >>> Since this is an all-new driver it might

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Tue, 2 May 2017 10:25:18 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >> Since this is an all-new driver it might be best to stagger the pull >> requests and merge the new tee subsystem (or

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Daniel, On Tue, 2 May 2017 10:25:18 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Since this is an all-new driver it might be best to stagger the pull > requests and merge the new tee subsystem (or whatever it is) after drm? > > Not sure what to best do here ... This will merge via Dave,

  1   2   >