Re: [PATCH v0 01/14] IB/hfi1, IB/qib: Make I2C terminology more inclusive

2024-04-08 Thread Dennis Dalessandro
On 4/3/24 4:30 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:25PM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote: >> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave" >> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's series >> to fix drivers/i2c[1], fix

Re: [PATCH v0 01/14] IB/hfi1, IB/qib: Make I2C terminology more inclusive

2024-04-08 Thread Easwar Hariharan
On 4/3/2024 8:54 AM, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > > On 4/3/24 4:30 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:25PM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote: >>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave" >>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following

Re: [PATCH v0 01/14] IB/hfi1, IB/qib: Make I2C terminology more inclusive

2024-04-03 Thread Leon Romanovsky
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:25PM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave" > with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's series > to fix drivers/i2c[1], fix the terminology where I had a role to play, now >