Hi guys,
so pushed the first few patches from this series. I hope that I
correctly managed to resolve the silent Xe merge conflict in drm-tip,
but would be nice if somebody could double check.
Then for the two remaining patches I've implemented most of what
Thomas suggest, e.g. the existing
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 4:57 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 12.01.24 um 13:51 schrieb Christian König:
> > Hi guys,
>
> just a gentle ping on this.
>
> Zack any more comments for the VMWGFX parts?
The new vmwgfx code looks great, thanks a lot for implementing it! In
fact the entire series
Am 12.01.24 um 13:51 schrieb Christian König:
Hi guys,
just a gentle ping on this.
Zack any more comments for the VMWGFX parts?
Thanks,
Christian.
same as the last time. Things I've changed:
Implemented the requirements from Zack to correctly fill in the busy
placements for VMWGFX.
Hi guys,
same as the last time. Things I've changed:
Implemented the requirements from Zack to correctly fill in the busy
placements for VMWGFX.
Renamed the placement flags to desired and fallback as suggested by
Michel.
Rebased on drm-tip instead of drm-misc-next and fixed XE as well.
Please
On 2024-01-09 09:34, Christian König wrote:
> Am 09.01.24 um 09:14 schrieb Thomas Hellström:
>> On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 08:47 +0100, Christian König wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm trying to make this functionality a bit more useful for years now
>>> since we multiple reports that behavior of drivers can be
Am 09.01.24 um 09:14 schrieb Thomas Hellström:
Hi, Christian
On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 08:47 +0100, Christian König wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm trying to make this functionality a bit more useful for years now
since we multiple reports that behavior of drivers can be suboptimal
when multiple placements
Hi, Christian
On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 08:47 +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm trying to make this functionality a bit more useful for years now
> since we multiple reports that behavior of drivers can be suboptimal
> when multiple placements be given.
>
> So basically instead of
Hi guys,
I'm trying to make this functionality a bit more useful for years now
since we multiple reports that behavior of drivers can be suboptimal
when multiple placements be given.
So basically instead of hacking around the TTM behavior in the driver
once more I've gone ahead and changed the
Hi guys,
I'm trying to make this functionality a bit more useful for years now
since we multiple reports that behavior of drivers can be suboptimal
when multiple placements be given.
So basically instead of hacking around the TTM behavior in the driver
once more I've gone ahead and changed the
