Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901
On Wednesday June 16 2010 10:45:34 Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: Anyway, I will try to bisect today and report back :) Well, I tried. Does this message: Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 0 steps) [29ba8a84f7cf5c29a5f38688a1ac0ccf41d8e4ec] XvMC: everyone's using execbuffer! mean I finished the process? Did that help? Regards -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:10:35 +0200, Marc Deop i Argemà damnsh...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday June 16 2010 10:45:34 Marc Deop i Argemà wrote: Anyway, I will try to bisect today and report back :) Well, I tried. Does this message: Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 0 steps) [29ba8a84f7cf5c29a5f38688a1ac0ccf41d8e4ec] XvMC: everyone's using execbuffer! mean I finished the process? One more step. Test that commit and tell git bisect (good|bad) and it will print a slightly more verbose statement of which commit is triggering the freeze. Thanks, -ickle -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7 resend] drm/i915: Add the support of eDP on DP-D for Ibex/CPT
On 2010.06.14 18:19:46 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:32:21 +0800, Zhenyu Wang zhen...@linux.intel.com wrote: From: Zhao Yakui yakui.z...@intel.com This one adds support for eDP that connected on PCH DP-D port instead of CPU DP-A port, and only DP-D port could be used for eDP. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27220 Instead of changing a ton of EDP checks to be EDP || PCH_EDP, why aren't you just setting the output type to edp when you detect that DPD is EDP? There's obviously difference between eDP from CPU and eDP from PCH, e.g no FDI link setup for CPU eDP, so not fit in same output type. Or do you think a new output type might be better for it? -- Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd. $gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901
On Wednesday June 16 2010 15:57:41 Chris Wilson wrote:
One more step. Test that commit and tell git bisect (good|bad) and it will
print a slightly more verbose statement of which commit is triggering the
freeze.
Sometimes I amaze myself :S It clearly says *after* this.
I'll do that tonight
However, I have to comment that the system has been stable with the 2.12RC for
two hours after applying this patch from my distribution (Archlinux):
diff -up xf86-video-intel-2.11.0/src/drmmode_display.c.no-flip xf86-video-
intel-2.11.0/src/drmmode_display.c
--- xf86-video-intel-2.11.0/src/drmmode_display.c.no-flip 2010-05-03
15:30:19.0 -0400
+++ xf86-video-intel-2.11.0/src/drmmode_display.c 2010-05-03
15:30:59.0 -0400
@@ -1504,10 +1504,15 @@ Bool drmmode_pre_init(ScrnInfoPtr scrn,
gp.value = has_flipping;
(void)drmCommandWriteRead(intel-drmSubFD, DRM_I915_GETPARAM, gp,
sizeof(gp));
+
+xf86DrvMsg(scrn-scrnIndex, X_INFO,
+ Pageflipping %s in kernel, %s disabled in X\n,
+ has_flipping ? enabled : disabled,
+ has_flipping ? but : and);
if (has_flipping) {
xf86DrvMsg(scrn-scrnIndex, X_INFO,
- Kernel page flipping support detected, enabling\n);
- intel-use_pageflipping = TRUE;
+ Don't panic: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/588421\n;);
+ intel-use_pageflipping = FALSE;
drmmode-flip_count = 0;
drmmode-event_context.version = DRM_EVENT_CONTEXT_VERSION;
drmmode-event_context.vblank_handler = drmmode_vblank_handler;
diff -up xf86-video-intel-2.11.0/src/i830_dri.c.no-flip xf86-video-
intel-2.11.0/src/i830_dri.c
--- xf86-video-intel-2.11.0/src/i830_dri.c.no-flip 2010-03-29
14:23:02.0 -0400
+++ xf86-video-intel-2.11.0/src/i830_dri.c 2010-05-03 15:30:19.0
-0400
@@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ Bool I830DRI2ScreenInit(ScreenPtr screen
info.CopyRegion = I830DRI2CopyRegion;
#if DRI2INFOREC_VERSION = 4
- if (intel-use_pageflipping) {
+ if (intel-use_pageflipping || 1) {
info.version = 4;
info.ScheduleSwap = I830DRI2ScheduleSwap;
info.GetMSC = I830DRI2GetMSC;
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
