Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: prefer vma->size for vma iomap

Quoting Matthew Auld (2018-03-17 17:42:07) > It makes more sense to use vma->size, since this determines the number > of entries we inserted into the vm, while the vma->node.size is the size > of the vm window we reserved, which may also include padding. At the > very least this keeps things

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/36] drm/i915: Don't fiddle with rps/rc6 across GPU reset

On 3/14/2018 3:07 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: Resetting the GPU doesn't affect the RPS/RC6 state, so we can stop forcibly reloading the registers. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Ville Syrjälä Changes look good to me. Reviewed-by: Sagar

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] PSR lag fixes

Hi, On 16-03-18 01:16, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 04:35:55PM -0700, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: On Wed, 2018-03-14 at 23:09 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 14-03-18 21:49, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 09:25 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/36] drm/i915: Rename rps min/max frequencies

On 3/14/2018 3:07 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: In preparation for more layers of limits, rename the existing limits to hw and user. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 34

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: make edp optimize config

Hi Matt, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on v4.16-rc4] [also build test ERROR on next-20180316] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: make edp optimize config

Hi Matt, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on v4.16-rc4] [also build test ERROR on next-20180316] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the drm tree

Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c between commit: db61d160b3ed ("drm/i915: Remove the pointless 1:1 matrix copy") from the drm tree and commit: d5517a39dce4 ("drm/i915: Remove the blob->data casts") from the

[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] cgroup: cgroup_idr_lock can be static

Fixes: d6de4e7e9e60 ("cgroup: Allow registration and lookup of cgroup private data (v2)") Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu --- cgroup.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c index

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/8] cgroup: Allow registration and lookup of cgroup private data (v2)

Hi Matt, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on next-20180309] [also build test WARNING on v4.16-rc6] [cannot apply to v4.16-rc4 v4.16-rc3 v4.16-rc2] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/36] drm/i915: Pull IPS into RPS

On 3/14/2018 3:07 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: IPS was the precursor to RPS on Ironlake. It serves the same function, and so should be pulled under the intel_gt_pm umbrella. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Looks good except subject should be "Pull IPS into GT PM". It seems