On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:19 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:51:20AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 21:05:03 +0200, Daniel Vetter
>> wrote:
>> > Daniel Vetter (6):
>> > drm: extract drm_gem_object_init
>> > drm: free core gem object from driver callbac
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 07:42:57 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:31:57 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > It's likely that this fixes problems with LVDS coming up blank about
> > 50% of the time on Ironlake, (noted on lenovo x201s).
>
> For what it's worth, further testing suggests that
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:41:59 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> ->dev_private at that point is NULL and is initialied only a few lines
> later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Tettamanti
> ---
> I'm beginnig to dive into DRM&KMS, that assignment really confused me :P
Applied. Thanks!
pgph9nR9DtFZC.pgp
D
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 22:43 +0800, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 17:09 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> > Update the self-refresh watermark for display plane/cursor and enable
> > the memory self-refresh on Ironlake. The watermark is also updated for
> > the active display plane.
> >
> >
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:57:51PM +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> My technique to recompile kernels, now, is based on src.rpm at
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8
Yeah, I'm afraid that's not going to work.
> So any change this patch enter in fedora kernel ? or
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 21:46 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 08:45:11PM +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 18:36 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 06:19:20PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > > Can you give this patch a
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 08:45:11PM +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 18:36 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 06:19:20PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > Can you give this patch a try? It's not ready for upstream yet, but
> > > ought to work.
>
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 18:36 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 06:19:20PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Can you give this patch a try? It's not ready for upstream yet, but
> > ought to work.
>
> It would, of course, be more useful if I included the patch.
Hum can't appl
Jep sure.
At least from my experiences windows-opengl drivers are far superior
than the linux ones.
I usually get twice the FPS for the same game running it on windows.
(Thought about an RadeonHD4200 based laptop, is usually 2x as fast as 4500)
- Clemens
__
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:51:20AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 21:05:03 +0200, Daniel Vetter
> wrote:
> > Daniel Vetter (6):
> > drm: extract drm_gem_object_init
> > drm: free core gem object from driver callbacks
> > drm/i915: introduce i915_gem_alloc_object
> > drm/i
Hi all,
I'm buying a computer for a relative. The most graphics intensive
application she'll run is Google Earth. Besides that, she needs
excellent 2D performance and image quality.
I have a X4500 in my laptop and it works very well - under Linux.
However, I've heard some horror stories around th
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 21:05:03 +0200, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As promised here's my patch series to make struct drm_gem_object embedable.
> Also converts drm/i915 as a proof of concept.
>
> I've already looked at the radeon and nouveau modules and a straightforward
> replament of the g
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:43:04 -0400
Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 17:09 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> > Update the self-refresh watermark for display plane/cursor and enable
> > the memory self-refresh on Ironlake. The watermark is also updated for
> > the active display plane.
> >
>
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 06:19:20PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Can you give this patch a try? It's not ready for upstream yet, but
> ought to work.
It would, of course, be more useful if I included the patch.
commit bd599ffa48a679679434109ead29fcdf108ccc77
Author: Matthew Garrett
Date: We
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:10:22 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 22:35:19 +0100, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> > If the buffer is currently bound and does not meet the requested
> > alignment, then unbind it and repin.
>
> Do we have any users legitimately requesting an alignment? I thou
Can you give this patch a try? It's not ready for upstream yet, but
ought to work.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 22:35:19 +0100, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> If the buffer is currently bound and does not meet the requested
> alignment, then unbind it and repin.
Do we have any users legitimately requesting an alignment? I thought
they never existed or only lied when they did.
pgpgLm85h31ZK.p
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 17:58:00 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index a21f810..e7d789c
This should be a small power savings. Tested on Lenovo T410 (Ironlake), LVDS
VGA and DisplayPort, up to 1920x1200R.
v2: Add Sandybridge support, fix obvious math error.
Acked-by: Zhenyu Wang
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 26 --
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 17:03 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> On 2010.04.09 17:55:10 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > This should be a small power savings, but the Watts-Up I used to test is
> > only precise to within 100mW. Tested on Lenovo T410 (Ironlake), LVDS
> > VGA and DisplayPort, up to 1920x1200R.
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 17:09 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> Update the self-refresh watermark for display plane/cursor and enable
> the memory self-refresh on Ironlake. The watermark is also updated for
> the active display plane.
>
> More than 1W idle power is saved on one Ironlake laptop after enabl
On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 05:55 +0800, Adam Jackson wrote:
> This should be a small power savings, but the Watts-Up I used to test is
> only precise to within 100mW. Tested on Lenovo T410 (Ironlake), LVDS
> VGA and DisplayPort, up to 1920x1200R.
Very good point.
I test this patch on another laptop.
Update the self-refresh watermark for display plane/cursor and enable
the memory self-refresh on Ironlake. The watermark is also updated for
the active display plane.
More than 1W idle power is saved on one Ironlake laptop after enabling
memory self-refresh.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui
Signed-off-
From: Zhao Yakui
Now we don't define the update_wm callback function explicitly for
pineview platform. But as it also belongs to mobile platform, we will
use the function of i9xx_update_wm function to update its watermark again
after we configure the watermark. This is incorrect.
So we will add
On 2010.04.09 17:55:10 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> This should be a small power savings, but the Watts-Up I used to test is
> only precise to within 100mW. Tested on Lenovo T410 (Ironlake), LVDS
> VGA and DisplayPort, up to 1920x1200R.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson
Nice work for per crtc FDI
25 matches
Mail list logo
