On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:38:09 -0800, Scott James Remnant key...@google.com
wrote:
After a little bit of digging I found:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/commit/?h=asyncid=470d6985b508466308fc4c6aec945cdbf6de39b8
-Chris
I've tried this patch, but it doesn't really reduce the
Hi everyone,
would you mind putting something along the following into xf86-video-intel?
Thanks!
Helge Bahmann
---
Deactivate unused CRTCs
Have intel_crtc_dpms actually do something and deactivate CRTCs
on demand. This allows the X-Server to actually deactivate all
unused CRTCs, avoiding the
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 19:33, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.orgwrote:
On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:35:24 -0800
Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
Since MI_FLUSH_DW exists on gen6, and keithp says we still have
outstanding issues with missed blit IRQs there, I started trying it
today. Two
These modes are no longer needed or are not according to TV timing standards.
Intel PRM Vol 3 - Display Registers Updated - Section 5 TV-Out Programming /
5.2.1 Television Standards / 5.2.1.1 Timing tables
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@gmail.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c |
Adding 1080p supported modes according to new PRM version which is
internal for now.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@gmail.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c | 72 +++
1 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:38:16 +, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
Reverting de842eff4101 (drm/i915: Wait for LVDS panel power sequence)
should get another 0.4s back if intel_lvds_enable() is still in the
critical path. After that the focus looks to be upon speeding up
modeset.
As we continue to struggle to unravel the mysteries of sending a seqno
along with notification interrupt from the GPU to the CPU, fallback to
polling the seqno. We know that the seqno write eventually becomes
visible to the CPU as we find the seqno value has been updated during
hangcheck, so this
Makes the mode set routine a little cleaner and easier to extend.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 74 +-
1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git
This cleans up the mode set path a little further, making it easier to
extend for future platforms.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 62 ++
1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff
More i9xx mode set cleanups, further simplifying the mode set path and
making it easier to extend.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 402 --
1 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-)
diff
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:38:09 -0800, Scott James Remnant key...@google.com
wrote:
After a little bit of digging I found:
Am 13.12.2011 22:46, schrieb Jesse Barnes:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:30:42 +0100
Johannes Bauer dfnsonfsdu...@gmx.de wrote:
then echo that value into the max freq file, e.g.:
$ echo 400 /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_max_freq
This doesn't work for
joelaptop [/sys/kernel/debug/dri]: uname -a
Am 14.12.2011 03:49, schrieb Eugeni Dodonov:
But meanwhile, for better understanding what is going on with your machine,
could you setup some thermal sensors and check what do they say about
temperature? And also check with powertop about what is using the most
power out there?
Well,
13 matches
Mail list logo