On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 09:37:24AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
This got dropped as a result of the last round of comments. I didn't
test it on unsupported HW (which this is likely the case).
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net
Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
---
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 06:58:59PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
I'm seeing about a 5% FPS improvement across various benchmarks on my
IVB i3. Rumor has it that the higher end parts show even more benefit.
This derives from a patch originally given to me by Bernard. The docs
are confusing
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 06:29:44PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
I've added a bit of logic such that running the hangman test on chips
without any hw reset support at all doesn't wedge the gpu because the
reset failed. This relied on checking for non-null stop_rings.
Unfortunately I've botched a
On 06/14/2012 03:04 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
The RCBP workaround still applies on these chips, and we need VDS as well.
v2: remove MB boot fetch that snuck in (Daniel)
add workaround tags to comments for easier internal tracking (Daniel)
v3: only apply RCPB and VDS on SNB and VLV, IVB
Hello,
We are using an MiniPC with the following configuration:
- Intel SandyBridge PC Mainboard DH61AG and integrated Intel HD
Graphics 3000
- OS: Ubuntu 12.04 32bit
Our application processes video frames and displays the result on the
screen(1920x1080).
The video frames
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:22:51PM -0300, Eugeni Dodonov wrote:
On 06/14/2012 03:04 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
The RCBP workaround still applies on these chips, and we need VDS as well.
v2: remove MB boot fetch that snuck in (Daniel)
add workaround tags to comments for easier internal
Subject: [Bug 51061] GPU Hang using VAAPI
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51061
Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
We should not hit this under any sane conditions, but still, this does not
looks right.
CC: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
CC: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski herton.krzesin...@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Eugeni
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:03:38 -0300, Eugeni Dodonov eugeni.dodo...@intel.com
wrote:
We should not hit this under any sane conditions, but still, this does not
looks right.
For pedagology.
CC: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
CC: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
CC:
The history on this patch goes back quite a way. This time around, the
patch builds on top of the map_unsynchronized that Eric pushed. Eric's
patch attempted only to solve the problem for LLC machines. Unlike
my earlier versions of this patch (with the help from Daniel Vetter), we
do not attempt
10 matches
Mail list logo