Dear Chris,
Am Sonntag, den 10.02.2013, 23:21 + schrieb Chris Wilson:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:37:03PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 10.02.2013, 19:38 + schrieb Chris Wilson:
Reading the cspec pays dividends once again, as I found the 'Base of
Stolen Memory' config
At Sun, 10 Feb 2013 02:16:14 +0100,
David Härdeman wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:00:13AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:35:33PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
I'll break etiquette here and include the entire original message below
(and top-post!) since I'm sending
It's not that the assertion is incorrect, but rather that we can call
do_destroy early in loading, and we will falsely BUG().
Since contexts have been in for a while now, and in the internal APIs
are pretty stable, it should be fairly safe to remove this.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky
It's not that the assertion is incorrect, but rather that we can call
do_destroy early in loading, and we will falsely BUG().
Since contexts have been in for a while now, and in the internal APIs
are pretty stable, it should be fairly safe to remove this.
v2: Remove unused dev_priv, and dev
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 10:51:48 +0100
Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:30 AM, kbuild test robot
fengguang...@intel.com wrote:
tree: git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel.git drm-intel-nightly
head: 69f0d09dfd2d0579241389aee18ba50aa39d0de2
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:27:08 -0800
Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 10:51:48 +0100
Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:30 AM, kbuild test robot
fengguang...@intel.com wrote:
tree:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:54:57 -0800
Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote:
IGT is newer and arguably better. This change doesn't completely merge
the files because it's a bit simpler if we move the I9XX macro over to
IGT, and don't move over a few macros from IGT that libdrm doesn't care
about.
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:54:57 -0800
Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote:
IGT is newer and arguably better. This change doesn't completely merge
the files because it's a bit simpler if we move the I9XX macro over to
IGT, and don't move over a few macros from IGT that libdrm doesn't care
about.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 03:05:19PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:54:57 -0800
Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote:
IGT is newer and arguably better. This change doesn't completely merge
the files because it's a bit simpler if we move the I9XX macro over to
IGT, and
