Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 4/8] drm: Add driver-private objects to atomic state

2017-02-22 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 09:59 +0530, Archit Taneja wrote: > > On 02/22/2017 05:31 AM, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 15:37 +0530, Archit Taneja wrote: > >> > >> On 02/16/2017 05:43 AM, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > >>> On Wed, 2017

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 7/8] drm: Connector helper function to release resources

2017-02-23 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 09:09 +, Lankhorst, Maarten wrote: > Daniel Vetter schreef op di 14-02-2017 om 20:51 [+0100]: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran > > wrote: > > > On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 09:05 +, Lankhorst, Maarten wrote: > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 4/8] drm: Add driver-private objects to atomic state

2017-02-27 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 20:57 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:01:12AM +0000, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 15:37 +0530, Archit Taneja wrote: > > > > > > On 02/16/2017 05:43 AM, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 9/9] drm/i915: Set PWM divider to match desired frequency in vbt

2017-05-16 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 11:07 -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat wrote: > > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:21 PM, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran > wrote: > On Mon, 2017-05-15 at 17:43 -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 9/9] drm/i915: Set PWM divider to match desired frequency in vbt

2017-05-16 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 13:56 -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat wrote: > > > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran > wrote: > On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 11:07 -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat > wrote: > > > > > &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 9/9] drm/i915: Set PWM divider to match desired frequency in vbt

2017-05-17 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 17:39 -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat wrote: > > > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran > wrote: > On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 13:56 -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 5/5] drm/i915: Set PWM divider to match desired frequency in vbt

2017-05-17 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 17:34 -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat wrote: > Read desired PWM frequency from panel vbt and calculate the > value for divider in DPCD address 0x724 and 0x728 to have > as many bits as possible for PWM duty cyle for granularity of > brightness adjustment while the frequency divi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 1/5] drm/i915: Drop AUX backlight enable check for backlight control

2017-05-17 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
From: Puthikorn Voravootivat [put...@google.com] on behalf of Puthikorn Voravootivat [put...@chromium.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 5:33 PM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Pandiyan, Dhinakaran Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; Jani Nikula

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 3/5] drm/i915: Add option to support dynamic backlight via DPCD

2017-05-17 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 17:34 -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat wrote: > This patch adds option to enable dynamic backlight for eDP > panel that supports this feature via DPCD register and > set minimum / maximum brightness to 0% and 100% of the > normal brightness. > > Signed-off-by: Puthikorn Voravoot

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/dp: start a DPCD based DP sink/branch device quirk database

2017-05-18 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 14:10 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > Face the fact, there are Display Port sink and branch devices out there > in the wild that don't follow the Display Port specifications, or they > have bugs, or just otherwise require special treatment. Start a common > quirk database the driv

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 1/5] drm/i915: Drop AUX backlight enable check for backlight control

2017-05-18 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 14:04 -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat wrote: > > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran > wrote: > > > From: Puthikorn Voravootivat [put...@google.com] on behalf of &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 3/5] drm/i915: Add option to support dynamic backlight via DPCD

2017-05-23 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
Yeah, looks fine to me. -DK From: put...@google.com [mailto:put...@google.com] On Behalf Of Puthikorn Voravootivat Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 2:00 PM To: Pandiyan, Dhinakaran Cc: put...@chromium.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; jani.nik...@linux.intel.com

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10 3/3] drm/i915: Set PWM divider to match desired frequency in vbt

2017-05-30 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
The patch looks good overall, it would have been easier to merge if you'd sent this as the first patch in this version. Some comments inline. On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 18:42 -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat wrote: > Read desired PWM frequency from panel vbt and calculate the > value for divider in DPCD

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10 2/3] drm/i915: Add option to support dynamic backlight via DPCD

2017-05-30 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 18:42 -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat wrote: > This patch adds option to enable dynamic backlight for eDP > panel that supports this feature via DPCD register and > set minimum / maximum brightness to 0% and 100% of the > normal brightness. > > Signed-off-by: Puthikorn Voravoot

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/cnp: Panel Power sequence changes for CNP PCH.

2017-05-31 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 15:42 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > As for BXT, PP_DIVISOR was removed from CNP PCH and power > cycle delay has been moved to PP_CONTROL. > > Cc: Jani Nikula > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 10 +- > 1 file changed, 5 insertion

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10 2/3] drm/i915: Add option to support dynamic backlight via DPCD

2017-05-31 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 14:37 -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat wrote: > > > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran > wrote: > On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 18:42 -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat > wrote: > > This patch adds option to enable d

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cnp: Panel Power sequence changes for CNP PCH.

2017-05-31 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 14:54 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > As for BXT, PP_DIVISOR was removed from CNP PCH and power > cycle delay has been moved to PP_CONTROL. > > v2: Add missed pp_div write, that is now part of PP_CONTROL[8:4] > as on Broxton. (Found by DK) > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan > Cc:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cnp: Panel Power sequence changes for CNP PCH.

2017-05-31 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 23:46 +, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote: > On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 23:07 +0000, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 14:54 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > As for BXT, PP_DIVISOR was removed from CNP PCH and power > > > cycle delay h

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915/cnp: Backlight support for CNP.

2017-05-31 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 15:42 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Split out BXT and CNP's setup_backlight(),enable_backlight(), > disable_backlight() and hz_to_pwm() into > two separate functions instead of reusing BXT function. > > Reuse set_backlight() and get_backlight() since they have > no reference t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915/cnp: Backlight support for CNP.

2017-06-01 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
, 2017 9:29 AM To: Pandiyan, Dhinakaran Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Nikula, Jani Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915/cnp: Backlight support for CNP. On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 02:15 +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 15:42 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/cnp: Backlight support for CNP.

2017-06-01 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan -DK On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 15:33 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Split out BXT and CNP's setup_backlight(),enable_backlight(), > disable_backlight() and hz_to_pwm() into > two separate functions instead of reusing BXT function. > > Reuse set_backlight() and get_back

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10 1/3] drm/i915: Add heuristic to determine better way to adjust brightness

2017-06-02 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 18:42 -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat wrote: > Add heuristic to decide that AUX or PWM pin should use for > backlight brightness adjustment and modify i915 param description > to have auto, force disable, and force enable. > > The heuristic to determine that using AUX pin is be

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10 1/3] drm/i915: Add heuristic to determine better way to adjust brightness

2017-06-02 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 17:42 +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: Somehow the CC's got removed in my previous reply, adding them back. See one additional comment below. > On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 18:42 -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat wrote: > > Add heuristic to decide that AUX or PWM pin

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10 2/3] drm/i915: Add option to support dynamic backlight via DPCD

2017-06-02 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 18:42 -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat wrote: > This patch adds option to enable dynamic backlight for eDP > panel that supports this feature via DPCD register and > set minimum / maximum brightness to 0% and 100% of the > normal brightness. > > Signed-off-by: Puthikorn Voravoot

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915/cfl: Basic PM plumbing for Coffee Lake.

2017-06-02 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 15:42 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > All here is pretty much like Kabylake, expect the PCH. > > This patch exclude the addition of DMC, GuC and most workardounds since > they might have changes/updates. > > v2: Take advantage of IS_GEN9_BC minimizing the needed plumbing. > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915/cfl: Basic PM plumbing for Coffee Lake.

2017-06-02 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 21:25 +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 15:42 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > All here is pretty much like Kabylake, expect the PCH. > > > > This patch exclude the addition of DMC, GuC and most workardounds since > > they

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915/cfl: Coffe Lake reuses Kabylake DMC.

2017-06-02 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 15:43 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > From the DMC perspective the same firmware is used on > both platforms. We haven't recieved any separated release > specifically for Coffee Lake so let's just re-use what > is already there for Kabylake. > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi Typ

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/67] drm/i915/cnl: Allow dynamic cdclk changes on CNL

2017-06-05 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 19:55 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 04:41:07PM +, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 18:22 +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 12:15:27PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > > All the low level cdclk bits are present, so l

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 3/3] drm/i915: Add option to support dynamic backlight via DPCD

2017-06-05 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 19:04 -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat wrote: > This patch adds option to enable dynamic backlight for eDP > panel that supports this feature via DPCD register and > set minimum / maximum brightness to 0% and 100% of the > normal brightness. > > Change-Id: I52f04b814bb4cd9df570a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 3/3] drm/i915: Add option to support dynamic backlight via DPCD

2017-06-05 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
> > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran > wrote: > On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 19:04 -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat > wrote: > > This patch adds option to enable dynamic backlight for eDP > > panel that supports this feature

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/67] drm/i915/cnl: Allow dynamic cdclk changes on CNL

2017-06-06 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 08:24 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran > wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 19:55 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 04:41:07PM +, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote: > >> > On Mon

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/67] drm/i915/cnl: Allow dynamic cdclk changes on CNL

2017-06-06 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 11:12 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran > > wrote: > >> On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 08:24 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > >>> On Mo

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/cfl: Coffee Lake uses CNP PCH.

2017-06-07 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 12:19 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > So let's force it on the virtual detection. > > Also it is still the only silicon for now on this PCH, > so WARN otherwise. > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi > Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 4 >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/cfl: Basic DDI plumbing for Coffee Lake.

2017-06-07 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 12:20 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > All here is pretty much like Kabylake. > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/cfl: Introduce Display workarounds for Coffee Lake.

2017-06-07 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 12:20 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > The whole Display engine for Coffee Lake is pretty much > identical to the Kabylake. For this reason let's reuse > all display related production workardounds here even though Are these all the display workarounds we have or is this patch ju

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/cfl: Introduce Display workarounds for Coffee Lake.

2017-06-07 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Wed, 2017-06-07 at 21:52 +, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote: > On Wed, 2017-06-07 at 18:44 +0000, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 12:20 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > The whole Display engine for Coffee Lake is pretty much > > > identical to the Kaby

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/cfl: Basic DDI plumbing for Coffee Lake.

2017-06-07 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Wed, 2017-06-07 at 21:53 +, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote: > On Wed, 2017-06-07 at 18:04 +0000, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 12:20 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > All here is pretty much like Kabylake. > > > > > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiya

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/cfl: Introduce Coffee Lake workardounds.

2017-06-07 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 12:20 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Coffee Lake inherit most of Kabylake production > workardounds. > > Only difference identified so far is: > - WaDisableLSQCROPERFforOCL is marked as SIWA_NEVER > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi > --- > drivers/gpu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/huc: Load HuC on Coffeelake

2017-06-07 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Wed, 2017-06-07 at 11:43 -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: > Coffeelake reuses Kabylake's HUC firmware. s/Coffeelake/Coffee Lake That's how the other patches have it :) > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi > Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 i

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/17] drm/i915/cnl: Allow dynamic cdclk changes on CNL

2017-06-09 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 17:34 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 03:03:13PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > All the low level cdclk bits are present, so let's add the required > > hooks to reconfigure cdclk on the fly. > > > > v2: Rebase due to cnl_sanitize_cdclk() > > v3: Rebased

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/17] drm/i915/cnl: Allow dynamic cdclk changes on CNL

2017-06-09 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 22:02 +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 05:34:55PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 03:03:13PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > All the low level cdclk bits are present, so let's add the required > > > hooks to reconfigure cdclk on the fl

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cfl: Basic DDI plumbing for Coffee Lake.

2017-06-09 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 13:03 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > All here is pretty much like Kabylake. > > Including CFL-U has to use same ddi translation table > as KBL-U for now. > > v2: Include missed IS_COFFEELAKE on edp trans table. (DK) > Handle CFL-U with same translation table as KBL-U. (DK

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cfl: Basic DDI plumbing for Coffee Lake.

2017-06-09 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 15:02 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > All here is pretty much like Kabylake. > > Including CFL-U has to use same ddi translation table > as KBL-U for now. > > v2: Include missed IS_COFFEELAKE on edp trans table. (DK) > Handle CFL-U with same translation table as KBL-U. (DK

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't enable backlight at setup time.

2017-06-13 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 08:29 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 12-06-17 om 22:16 schreef Dhinakaran Pandiyan: > > Maarten and Ville noticed that we are enabling backlight via DP aux very > > early in the modeset_init path via the intel_dp_aux_setup_backlight() > > function. Looks like all we need

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't enable backlight at setup time.

2017-06-13 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 09:48 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Dhinakaran Pandiyan > wrote: > > Maarten and Ville noticed that we are enabling backlight via DP aux very > > early in the modeset_init path via the intel_dp_aux_setup_backlight() > > function. Looks like all we need to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Store 9 bits of PCI Device ID for platforms with a LP PCH

2017-06-16 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 16:26 +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 01:56:47PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > Although we use 9 bits of Device ID for identifying PCH, only 8 bits are > > stored in dev_priv->pch_id. This makes HAS_PCH_CNP_LP() and > > HAS_PCH_SPT_LP() incorrect. Fix

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Store 9 bits of PCI Device ID for platforms with a LP PCH

2017-06-16 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 23:35 +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:18:40PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:58:57PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:19:34PM +0300, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > > > On

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cnl: Add information to missing case.

2017-06-16 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 13:20 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > This missing case could be reached out on missing > type or missing voltage. Should we even reach this far with a missing DDI type? -DK > So let's add a debug > message to make our lives easier whenever this > might happen. > > Cc: Paulo

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cnl: Add information to missing case.

2017-06-16 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 14:12 -0700, Manasi Navare wrote: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 08:58:25PM +0000, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 13:20 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > This missing case could be reached out on missing > > > type or missing volta

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cnl: Add information to missing case.

2017-06-16 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 21:26 +, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote: > On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 21:21 +0000, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 14:12 -0700, Manasi Navare wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 08:58:25PM +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > > > On

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't enable backlight at setup time.

2017-06-19 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 11:08 -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > Maarten and Ville noticed that we are enabling backlight via DP aux very > early in the modeset_init path via the intel_dp_aux_setup_backlight() > function, since commit e7156c833903 ("drm/i915: Add Backlight Control using > DPCD for e

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RESEND v11 0/3] Enhancement to intel_dp_aux_backlight driver

2017-06-20 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 11:03 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 02:56:04PM -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat wrote: > > This patch set contain 3 patches which are already reviewed by DK. > > Another 6 patches in previous version was already merged in v7 and v9. > > - First patch se

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Always use 9 bits of the LPC bridge device ID for PCH detection

2017-06-20 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 16:03 +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Make the code less confusiong by always using the top 9 bits of the > LPC bridge device ID to detect the PCH type. We need to add a bit of > new code for WPT, and we need to adjust the KBP ID as w

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Fix GETCONNECTOR regression

2017-06-20 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 11:16 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > In > > commit 91eefc05f0ac71902906b2058360e61bd25137fe > Author: Daniel Vetter > Date: Wed Dec 14 00:08:10 2016 +0100 > > drm: Tighten locking in drm_mode_getconnector > > I reordered the logic a bit in that IOCTL, but that brok

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Fix GETCONNECTOR regression

2017-06-20 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
g in drm_mode_getconnector") > Cc: Sean Paul > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Jani Nikula > Cc: David Airlie > Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org > Reported-by: "H.J. Lu" > Tested-by: "H.J. Lu" > Cc: # v4.11+ > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freede

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Prevent kernel panic on reading out compliance debugfs files

2017-06-21 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 12:59 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > When reading all debugfs files on a system with DP-MST the kernel panics > on a null pointer dereference because intel_dp is null for a DP-MST > connector. Detect this case and skip those connectors. > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankho

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Prevent kernel panic when reading/writing compliance debugfs files, v2.

2017-06-26 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 10:18 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > When reading all debugfs files on a system with DP-MST the kernel panics > on a null pointer dereference because intel_dp is null for a DP-MST > connector. Detect this case and skip those connectors. > > Also fix the write for the DP

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Make DP-MST connector info work

2017-06-26 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
Patch looks correct, Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 10:33 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Commit 9a148a96fc3a ("drm/i915/debugfs: add dp mst info") adds support > for DP-MST to intel_connector_info, but forgot to remove the early > return for DP-MST. > > Remove it, an

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 3/3] drm/i915: Add option to support dynamic backlight via DPCD

2017-06-27 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 16:23 +0300, David Weinehall wrote: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 05:18:19PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:03:39PM -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat wrote: > > > This patch adds option to enable dynamic backlight for eDP > > > panel that supports this

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cfl: Fix Workarounds.

2017-06-29 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
I went and read Mika's review in [1] and also the patches posted and committed after that. The version currently in drm-tip deviates from his review and the fix here addresses Mika's comments correctly. Verified that BSpec does indeed say WaDisableKillLogic is applicable to only SKL and BXT. As

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Fix up CNL cdclk related limits

2017-07-07 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 11:24 AM To: Rodrigo Vivi Cc: intel-gfx; Pandiyan, Dhinakaran; Zanoni, Paulo R; Vivi, Rodrigo Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Fix up CNL cdclk related limits On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:54:47AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > I will rev

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915: Fix up CNL cdclk related limits

2017-07-10 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 16:02 +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Follow the GLK path when computing cdclk and related limits. CNL > pipes also produce two pixels per clock, so that's what we should > really use. However for the purposes of pixel rate calculatio

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915: Fix up CNL cdclk related limits

2017-07-10 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 21:11 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:34:11PM +0000, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 16:02 +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Consolidate max_cdclk_freq check in intel_crtc_compute_min_cdclk()

2017-07-11 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 22:33 +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Currently the .modeset_calc_cdclk() hooks check the final cdclk value > against the max allowed. That's not really sufficient since the low > level calc_cdclk() functions effectively clamp the min

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/i915: Track minimum acceptable cdclk instead of "minimum dotclock"

2017-07-11 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 16:00 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 02:47:42AM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > On Monday, July 10, 2017 10:33:46 PM PDT ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com > > wrote: > > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > > > Make the min_pixclk thing less confusing b

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/drm_module_reload: Don't require hda dynamic debug

2017-07-14 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 19:14 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > I can live without those logs, and it avoids a kernel > recompile&reboot. > Sounds reasonable, having hda dynamic debug does not feel like a necessity for module_reload testing. Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan > Signed-off-by: Danie

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Return correct EDP voltage swing table for 0.85V

2017-07-17 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
Looks like a typo in cf54ca8 ("drm/i915/cnl: Implement voltage swing sequence.") but Cc'ing Rodrigo, Clint to make sure this wasn't a workaround. -DK On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 11:21 -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > For 0.85V cnl_get_buf_trans_edp() returns the DP table, instead of EDP. > Use th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Return correct EDP voltage swing table for 0.85V

2017-07-17 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 18:55 +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > Looks like a typo in > > cf54ca8 ("drm/i915/cnl: Implement voltage swing sequence.") > > but Cc'ing Rodrigo, Clint to make sure this wasn't a workaround. > > -DK Checked with Clint

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Explicit the connector name for DP link training result

2017-07-18 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 17:25 +0300, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > This adds the connector name when printing a debug message about the DP > link training result. It is useful to figure out what connector is > failing when multiple DP connectors are used. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski > ---

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: s/INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen/INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) in i915_irq

2017-07-18 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 19:35 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Dhinakaran Pandiyan (2017-07-18 19:28:00) > > INTEL_GEN() appears to be the new way of doing these platform checks, so > > convert this i915_irq.c too. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson > -Ch

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use AUX for backlight only if eDP 1.4 or later

2017-07-19 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 15:59 +0530, Jenny TC wrote: > With older panels, AUX pin for backlight doesn't work. On some > panels, this causes backlight issues on S3 resume. What is it that we are missing in the resume path? > Enable the > feature only for eDP1.4 or later. I can't find the eDP 1.4

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Synchronize connectors states when switching from poll to irq

2017-07-19 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 15:32 +0300, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > After detecting an IRQ storm, hotplug detection will switch from > irq-based detection to poll-based detection. After a short delay or > when resetting storm detection from debugfs, detection will switch > back to being irq-based. > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use AUX for backlight only if eDP 1.4 or later

2017-07-20 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 18:35 +0300, David Weinehall wrote: > On 2017-07-20 12:33, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" > > wrote: > >> On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 15:59 +0530, Jenny TC wrote: > >>> With older panels, AUX pin

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] Revert "drm/i915: Add heuristic to determine better way to adjust brightness"

2017-07-20 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 12:25 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > This reverts commit 560a758d39c616f83ac25ff6e0816a49ebe6401c. > > The DPCD backlight commits regress a Thinkpad X1 Carbon 4th Gen and a > BXT-P (in CI). Enabling dynamic backlight boots to a black screen, and > enabling DPCD backlight lead

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use AUX for backlight only if eDP 1.4 or later

2017-07-20 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 10:06 +, Tc, Jenny wrote: > > >> With older panels, AUX pin for backlight doesn't work. > > > > What evidence do you have to back up that claim? > > Debugging further it's found that the panel I am having doesn't support AUX > Backlight. > > cat /sys/kernel/debug/dr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/dp/mst: Sideband message transaction to power up/down nodes

2017-09-11 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 16:33 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 05:14:58PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > The POWER_DOWN_PHY and POWER_UP_PHY sideband message transactions allow > > the source to reqest any node in a mst path or a whole path to be > > powered down or up. Th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Refresh VLV/CHV PSR comments on HW PSR_state machine.

2017-09-12 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 15:42 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > DK had pointed out a comment there was hard to understand, so I > tried to read back again and I couldn't understand that as well. > So let me re-phrase that in a way that anyone can understand > later, even myself. > This reads much better

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/mst: Use MST sideband message transaction for dpms

2017-09-12 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 19:17 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 07:11:32PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 06:26:34PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > > Use the POWER_DOWN_PHY and POWER_UP_PHY sideband message trasactions to > > > set power states for

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/mst: Use MST sideband message transaction for dpms

2017-09-12 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 19:08 +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 19:17 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 07:11:32PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 06:26:34PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/dp: Remove intel_dp->is_mst check in intel_dp_check_mst_status

2017-09-13 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 12:32 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Dhinakaran Pandiyan > wrote: > > There is just only one caller now, which already checks for > > intel_dp->is_mst. So, remove this and fix some braces while at it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan > > --- >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/dp: Avoid more dpcd transactions after resume failure

2017-09-13 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 16:24 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 04:57:25PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_resume() fails if there are dpcd failures, so > > there's no need to try that again in _check_mst_status() > > That commit message somehow does

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/dp: Remove intel_dp->is_mst check in intel_dp_check_mst_status

2017-09-13 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 16:31 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 04:57:26PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > There is just only one caller now, which already checks for > > intel_dp->is_mst. So, remove this and fix some braces while at it. > > Hmm. So this depends on the subt

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/dp: DPCD register defines for link

2017-09-13 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 09:00 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Dhinakaran Pandiyan > wrote: > > Link status is available in the ESI field on devices with DPCD r1.2 or > > higher. DP spec also says "An MST upstream device shall use this field > > instead of the Link/Sink Device Statu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Trim gen8_irq_handler

2017-09-14 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 19:18 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > The goal here is to trim an excess posting read and keep the predicates Curious why we do the posting reads, is that a hardware requirement? > tight (reusing the same predicate throughout for GT ack/handling). > > add/remove: 0/0 grow/sh

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915/mst: Debug log connector name in destroy_connector()

2017-09-14 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 17:20 -0700, Ausmus, James wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan > wrote: > > Print connector name in destroy_connect() and this doesn't add any extra > > lines to dmesg. The debug macro has been moved before the unregister > > call so that we don't l

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Trim gen8_irq_handler

2017-09-14 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 09:37 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Pandiyan, Dhinakaran (2017-09-14 08:20:21) > > > > On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 19:18 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > The goal here is to trim an excess posting read and keep the predicates > > > > Cur

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/dp: Handle check_mst_status() failure in one place

2017-09-14 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 14:32 -0700, Ausmus, James wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan > wrote: > > The caller already has code to handle failure, no need to duplicate > > that. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 6 --

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dp: Protect link training with connection mutex

2017-09-15 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 15:26 -0700, Ausmus, James wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan > wrote: > > The other instances of link training are protected with > > connection_mutex, so do the same in check_mst_status() too. > > We don't seem to be taking connection_mutex arou

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915/dp: Remove redundant can_mst checks in intel_dp_configure_mst()

2017-09-15 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 15:36 -0700, Ausmus, James wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan > wrote: > > intel_dp_can_mst() performs these checks. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 6 -- > > 1 file changed, 6 deletions

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dp: Protect link training with connection mutex

2017-09-18 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 13:10 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 04:57:29PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > The other instances of link training are protected with > > connection_mutex, so do the same in check_mst_status() too. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cnp: Display Wa #1179: WaHardHangonHotPlug

2017-09-18 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Mon, 2017-09-18 at 16:56 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > "CNL PCH chance of hang when software accesses south display > registers after hotplug is enabled. > Workaround: Program 0xC2000 bits 11:8 = 0xF before enabling > south display hotplug detection." > > "Workaround only needs to be applied

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/mst: Use MST sideband message transactions for dpms control

2017-09-19 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 13:06 -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > Use the POWER_DOWN_PHY and POWER_UP_PHY sideband message transactions to > set power states for downstream sinks. Apart from giving us the ability > to set power state for individual sinks, this fixes the below test for > me. > > $ xr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dp: Protect link training with connection mutex

2017-09-19 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 15:42 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 09:50:30PM +0000, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 13:10 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 04:57:29PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt] igt/kms_psr_sink_crc: Add psr_drrs subtest

2017-09-19 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 17:00 -0700, Radhakrishna Sripada wrote: > Platforms do not support psr and drrs simultaneously. > Adding a subtest to make the check. > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada > --- > tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c | 14 ++ > 1

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/dp: Clean up intel_dp_check_mst_status

2017-09-20 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 12:11 -0700, Ausmus, James wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan > wrote: > > Rewriting this code without the goto, I believe, makes it more readable. > > One functional change that has been included is the handling of failed ESI > > register reads. In

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/dp: Clean up intel_dp_check_mst_status

2017-09-20 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 13:02 -0700, Ausmus, James wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran > wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 12:11 -0700, Ausmus, James wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan > >> wrote: > >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt] igt/kms_psr_sink_crc: Fix regression in psr_drrs subtest

2017-09-21 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 07:53 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:37:31AM +, Radhakrishna Sripada wrote: > > The substring to be matched is modified to reflect kernel code. > > Well, technically it is not a regression on psr_drrs because it has > this bug since the beginning

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: DMC 1.04 for Kabylake

2017-11-02 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Thu, 2017-11-02 at 07:27 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 10:34:37AM +, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Wed, 01 Nov 2017, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: > > > There is a new version of DMC available for KBL. > > > > Nobody's going to pull this to linux-firmware if you don't send it

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm/vblanks: Deal with HW vblank counter resets.

2017-11-07 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-11-07 at 13:39 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 10:47:00AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On 07/11/17 07:26 AM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > > Some HW vblank counters reset due to power management events, which messes > > > up the vblank counting logic. This lea

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Eliminate some encoder->crtc usage from DP code

2017-11-08 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 22:51 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Extract the current crtc from the crtc state rather than via > the legacy encoder->crtc pointer whenever possible. > There are still some encoder->crtc remaining. How much of a problem is this? > Signed-off-by:

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >