On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 11:46:22AM +0100, Sean Young wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 11:08:22AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > On 10/19/23 12:51, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 03:57:48PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > >> On 10/17/23 11:17, Sean Young wrote:
>
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 03:26:57PM +0800, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 04:58:23 +, David Laight wrote:
> > on 3 Mar 2022 10:27:29 +0800, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
> > > The problem is the mis-use of iterator outside the loop on exit, and
> > > the iterator will be the HEAD's container_o
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 04:37:55PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 09:49:34AM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 07:57:12PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> > > [REQUEST]
> > >
> > > Would it be possib
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 07:57:12PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> [REQUEST]
>
> Would it be possible for the patches that have already received Acked-by's in
> this series to be accepted and applied to the tree? I lost an Acked-by (in
> intel-panel.c) because it had a merge conflict with a new
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 02:00:12PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 09:26:36PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:15:07PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 02:47:03PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:15:07PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 02:47:03PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > This is a giant CC list.
>
> Yes, this is because I received feedback [1] on an earlier patchset
> directing me to add the reviewers of patches to the cover lett
Note that the locking plan in this one is already outdated, I overlooked a
> >> few fun issues around any printk() going back to console_lock.
> >>
> >> I think remaining bits:
> >>
> >> - Ack from Daniel Thompson for the backlight bits, he wanted to check
t; remove this check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
> Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg
> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst
> Cc: Lee Jones
> Cc: Daniel Thompson
> Cc: Jingoo Han
Acked-by: Daniel Thompson
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/lcd.c | 11 ---
>
Vetter
> Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg
> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst
> Cc: Lee Jones
> Cc: Daniel Thompson
> Cc: Jingoo Han
> Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Cc: Daniel Vetter
> Cc: Hans de Goede
> Cc: Yisheng Xie
> Cc: "Michał
Add static inline to the dummy version.
>
> Cc: Richard Purdie
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
> Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg
> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst
> Cc: Lee Jones
> Cc: Daniel Thompson
> Cc: Jingoo Han
> Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Cc: Daniel Vetter
>
Add static inline to the dummy version.
>
> Cc: Richard Purdie
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
> Cc: Lee Jones
> Cc: Daniel Thompson
> Cc: Jingoo Han
> Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Cc: Daniel Vetter
> Cc: Hans de Goede
> Cc: Yisheng Xie
> Cc: linux-fb...@vger.ke
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 01:40:58PM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> On 27.02.2018 12:54, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 04:24:15PM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> >> On 26.02.2018 11:57, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 22 Feb 2018, Daniel Thompson
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 04:24:15PM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> On 26.02.2018 11:57, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Feb 2018, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 02:01:16PM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> >>> Add PWM mode to pwm_config() fu
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 02:01:16PM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> Add PWM mode to pwm_config() function. The drivers which uses pwm_config()
> were adapted to this change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-rx1950.c | 11 +--
> drivers/bus/ts-nbus.c
e that is fixed then:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson
> ---
> v3: Daniel Thompson caught the C99 warning issue w/ using {0}; using
> {.exp_name = xxx} instead.
>
> v2: add macro to zero out local struct, and fill KBUILD_MODNAME by default
>
>
On 28/01/15 06:00, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> At present, dma_buf_export() takes a series of parameters, which
> makes it difficult to add any new parameters for exporters, if required.
>
> Make it simpler by moving all these parameters into a struct, and pass
> the struct * as parameter to dma_buf_exp
On 04/11/14 22:09, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Currently there is no way to implement async flips using atomic, that
> essentially requires us to be able to cancel pending requests
> mid-flight.
>
> To be able to do that (and I guess we want this since vblank synced
> updates whic opportunistically can
On 03/11/14 14:53, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 02:45:28PM +0000, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>>> index 70bd67cf86e3..bd38df3cbe55 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
>>&
On 02/11/14 13:19, Daniel Vetter wrote:> The atomic users and helpers
assume that there is always a obj->state
> structure around. Which means drivers need to somehow create that at
> driver load time. Also it should obviously reset hardware state, so
> needs to be reset upon resume.
>
> Finally th
19 matches
Mail list logo
