Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 00/20] Initial Xe driver submission

2023-01-17 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 11:17 AM Matthew Brost wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:54:25AM +0100, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 09:27:57PM +, Matthew Brost wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 12:21:08PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > > > > > > On 22/12/2022 22:21,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 00/20] Initial Xe driver submission

2023-01-17 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 4:29 PM Matthew Brost wrote: > Hello, > > This is a submission for Xe, a new driver for Intel GPUs that supports both > integrated and discrete platforms starting with Tiger Lake (first platform > with > Intel Xe Architecture). The intention of this new driver is to have

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 04/20] drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a work queue rather than kthread

2023-01-11 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 4:32 PM Matthew Brost wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 04:18:01PM -0600, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 2:50 AM Tvrtko Ursulin < > > tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 10/01/2023 14:08,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 04/20] drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a work queue rather than kthread

2023-01-11 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 2:50 AM Tvrtko Ursulin < tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On 10/01/2023 14:08, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 5:28 AM Tvrtko Ursulin > > mailto:tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com>> > > > wrote: > &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 04/20] drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a work queue rather than kthread

2023-01-10 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 5:28 AM Tvrtko Ursulin < tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > On 09/01/2023 17:27, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > [snip] > > > >>> AFAICT it proposes to have 1:1 between *userspace* created > > contexts (per > &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 04/20] drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a work queue rather than kthread

2023-01-09 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 7:46 AM Tvrtko Ursulin < tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On 06/01/2023 23:52, Matthew Brost wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 09:43:41PM +, Matthew Brost wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 01:02:15PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > >>> > >>> On 02/01/2023

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 04/20] drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a work queue rather than kthread

2023-01-09 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 1:40 PM Matthew Brost wrote: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 08:30:19AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Dec 2022 12:55:08 +0100 > > Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 30 Dec 2022 11:20:42 +0100 > > > Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > > > > Hello Matthew, > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 3/3] drm/doc/rfc: VM_BIND uapi definition

2022-06-30 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 8:49 PM Niranjana Vishwanathapura < niranjana.vishwanathap...@intel.com> wrote: > VM_BIND and related uapi definitions > > v2: Reduce the scope to simple Mesa use case. > v3: Expand VM_UNBIND documentation and add > I915_GEM_VM_BIND/UNBIND_FENCE_VALID > and

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 3/3] drm/doc/rfc: VM_BIND uapi definition

2022-06-30 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 10:14 AM Matthew Auld wrote: > On 30/06/2022 06:11, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 8:49 PM Niranjana Vishwanathapura > > > <mailto:niranjana.vishwanathap...@intel.com>> wrote: > > > > VM_BIND and related

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 3/3] drm/doc/rfc: VM_BIND uapi definition

2022-06-29 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 8:49 PM Niranjana Vishwanathapura < niranjana.vishwanathap...@intel.com> wrote: > VM_BIND and related uapi definitions > > v2: Reduce the scope to simple Mesa use case. > v3: Expand VM_UNBIND documentation and add > I915_GEM_VM_BIND/UNBIND_FENCE_VALID > and

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC v3 1/3] drm/doc/rfc: VM_BIND feature design document

2022-06-08 Thread Jason Ekstrand
2022 at 11:18:11AM -0700, Niranjana Vishwanathapura > wrote: > >>>On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 12:12:03PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > >>>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 6:52 PM Niranjana Vishwanathapura > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On F

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC v3 1/3] drm/doc/rfc: VM_BIND feature design document

2022-06-07 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 6:52 PM Niranjana Vishwanathapura < niranjana.vishwanathap...@intel.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 10:20:25AM +0300, Lionel Landwerlin wrote: > > On 02/06/2022 23:35, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 3:11 P

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC v3 1/3] drm/doc/rfc: VM_BIND feature design document

2022-06-02 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 3:11 PM Niranjana Vishwanathapura < niranjana.vishwanathap...@intel.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 01:28:36PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote: > >On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 05:25:49PM +0300, Lionel Landwerlin wrote: > >> On 17/05/2022 21:32, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/27] Revert "drm/i915/gt: Propagate change in error status to children on unhold"

2021-08-20 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 1:22 AM Matthew Brost wrote: > > Propagating errors to dependent fences is wrong, don't do it. A selftest > in the following exposed the propagating of an error to a dependent > fence after an engine reset. I feel like we could still have a bit of a better message. Maybe

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add pci ids and uapi for DG1

2021-08-12 Thread Jason Ekstrand
itely just enable the uapi parts by default. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst > > References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/11584 > > Cc: Jordan Justen jordan.l.jus...@intel.com > > Cc: Jason Ekstrand ja...@jlekstrand.net >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use locked access to ctx->engines in set_priority

2021-08-12 Thread Jason Ekstrand
aster with > a proper design fix. > > Also since there's only one caller of context_apply_all left and it's > really just a loop, inline it and then inline the lopp body too. This > is how all other callers that take the engine lock loop over engines, > it's much simpler. >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/doc/rfc: drop lmem uapi section

2021-08-10 Thread Jason Ekstrand
Acked-by: Jason Ekstrand On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 7:34 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > We still have quite a bit more work to do with overall reworking of > the ttm-based dg1 code, but the uapi stuff is now finalized with the > latest pull. So remove that. > > This also fix

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Release ctx->syncobj on final put, not on ctx close

2021-08-07 Thread Jason Ekstrand
a reference. This tripped up Jason when reimplementing the single timeline feature in commit 00dae4d3d35d4f526929633b76e00b0ab4d3970d Author: Jason Ekstrand Date: Thu Jul 8 10:48:12 2021 -0500 drm/i915: Implement SINGLE_TIMELINE with a syncobj (v4) We could fix the bug by holding ctx->mu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH -next] drm/i915: fix i915_globals_exit() section mismatch error

2021-08-04 Thread Jason Ekstrand
o allow them. My gut says we actually want to back-port https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/YPk3OCMrhg7UlU6T@phenom.ffwll.local/ instead. Daniel, thoughts? --Jason > > Fixes: 1354d830cb8f ("drm/i915: Call i915_globals_exit() if > pci_register_device() fails") > Signed-off-b

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: delete gpu reloc code

2021-08-03 Thread Jason Ekstrand
Both are Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 7:49 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > It's already removed, this just garbage collects it all. > > v2: Rebase over s/GEN/GRAPHICS_VER/ > > v3: Also ditch eb.reloc_pool and eb.reloc_context (Maarten) > > Signed-off

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/userptr: Probe existence of backing struct pages upon creation

2021-08-03 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 10:09 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 4:22 PM Matthew Auld > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 at 17:10, Tvrtko Ursulin > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 26/07/2021 16:14, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: prefer the create_user helper

2021-07-28 Thread Jason Ekstrand
such regions. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld Cc: Jason Ekstrand Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand --- .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c| 46 ++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c b/drivers/gpu/drm

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/11] drm/i915: Extract i915_module.c

2021-07-27 Thread Jason Ekstrand
it table is a lot more obvious. None of those are deal-breakers but they're kind-of nice. Anyway, this one is also Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand --Jason > There was a bug to fix relating to mock tests, but that is where the > exercise should have stopped for now. After that it IMHO spiral

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: move intel_context slab to direct module init/exit

2021-07-26 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:31 AM Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > On 26/07/2021 17:20, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:08 AM Tvrtko Ursulin > > wrote: > >> On 26/07/2021 16:42, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jul 26, 202

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: move intel_context slab to direct module init/exit

2021-07-26 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:08 AM Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > On 26/07/2021 16:42, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 10:30 AM Jason Ekstrand > > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:35 AM Tvrtko Ursulin > >> wrote: > >>>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Remove i915_globals

2021-07-26 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 2:29 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > No longer used. > > Cc: Jason Ekstrand > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand But, also, tvrtko is right that dumping all that stuff in i915_pci.c isn't great. Mind typing a quick follow-on that

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: move vma slab to direct module init/exit

2021-07-26 Thread Jason Ekstrand
c global.slab_vmas to just a > slab_vmas. > > We have to keep i915_drv.h include in i915_globals otherwise there's > nothing anymore that pulls in GEM_BUG_ON. > > Cc: Jason Ekstrand > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_globals.c | 3 +-

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: move scheduler slabs to direct module init/exit

2021-07-26 Thread Jason Ekstrand
emoving the static global.slab_dependencies|priorities to just a > slab_dependencies|priorities. > > Cc: Jason Ekstrand > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_globals.c | 2 -- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_globals.h | 2 -- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_p

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: move request slabs to direct module init/exit

2021-07-26 Thread Jason Ekstrand
obal.slab_requests|execute_cbs to just a > slab_requests|execute_cbs. > > Cc: Jason Ekstrand > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_globals.c | 2 -- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 2 ++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 47 ++

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: move intel_context slab to direct module init/exit

2021-07-26 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 10:30 AM Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:35 AM Tvrtko Ursulin > wrote: > > > > > > On 23/07/2021 20:29, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > With the global kmem_cache shrink infrastructure gone there's nothing > &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: move gem_objects slab to direct module init/exit

2021-07-26 Thread Jason Ekstrand
lobal.slab_objects to just a > slab_objects. > > Cc: Jason Ekstrand > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c | 26 +++--- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h | 3 +++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_globa

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: move gem_context slab to direct module init/exit

2021-07-26 Thread Jason Ekstrand
c global.slab_luts to just a > slab_luts. > > Cc: Jason Ekstrand > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c | 25 +++-- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.h | 3 +++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_globals

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915: Migrate memory to SMEM when imported cross-device (v8)

2021-07-26 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 10:29 AM Matthew Auld wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 at 16:11, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:12 AM Matthew Auld > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 at 18:21, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: move intel_context slab to direct module init/exit

2021-07-26 Thread Jason Ekstrand
patch because there's quite a bit of > > noise with removing the static global.slab_ce to just a > > slab_ce. > > > > Cc: Jason Ekstrand > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c | 25 - &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: move i915_buddy slab to direct module init/exit

2021-07-26 Thread Jason Ekstrand
global.slab_blocks to just a > slab_blocks. > > Cc: Jason Ekstrand > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.c | 25 - > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.h | 3 ++- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_globals.c | 2 -- > dri

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: move i915_active slab to direct module init/exit

2021-07-26 Thread Jason Ekstrand
global.slab_cache to just a slab_cache. > > Cc: Jason Ekstrand > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c | 31 ++--- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h | 3 +++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_globals.c | 2 -- >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Check for nomodeset in i915_init() first

2021-07-26 Thread Jason Ekstrand
t; So move that check first, for a bit of orderliness. With Jason's > module init/exit table this now becomes trivial. > > Cc: Jason Ekstrand > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/userptr: Probe existence of backing struct pages upon creation

2021-07-26 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:31 AM Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > Op 23-07-2021 om 13:34 schreef Matthew Auld: > > From: Chris Wilson > > > > Jason Ekstrand requested a more efficient method than userptr+set-domain > > to determine if the userptr object was backed by a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/userptr: Probe existence of backing struct pages upon creation

2021-07-26 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:06 AM Matthew Auld wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 at 18:48, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/12044 > > Cool, is that ready to go? i.e can we start merging the kernel + IGT side. Yes, it

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915: Migrate memory to SMEM when imported cross-device (v8)

2021-07-26 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:12 AM Matthew Auld wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 at 18:21, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > > This patch series fixes an issue with discrete graphics on Intel where we > > allowed dma-buf import while leaving the object in local memory. This >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/30] Remove CNL support

2021-07-23 Thread Jason Ekstrand
Generally a big fan.  --Jason On July 23, 2021 19:11:34 Lucas De Marchi wrote: Patches 1 and 2 are already being reviewed elsewhere. Discussion on 2nd patch made me revive something I started after comment from Ville at

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/userptr: Probe existence of backing struct pages upon creation

2021-07-23 Thread Jason Ekstrand
Are there IGTs for this anywhere? On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 12:47 PM Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/12044 > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 6:35 AM Matthew Auld wrote: > > > > From: Chris Wilson > > > > Jason

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/userptr: Probe existence of backing struct pages upon creation

2021-07-23 Thread Jason Ekstrand
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/12044 On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 6:35 AM Matthew Auld wrote: > > From: Chris Wilson > > Jason Ekstrand requested a more efficient method than userptr+set-domain > to determine if the userptr object was backed by a comple

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915/gem: Always call obj->ops->migrate unless can_migrate fails

2021-07-23 Thread Jason Ekstrand
ete, the object will have pages, obj->mm.region will be correct, and we're done lying. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c | 9 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c b/drivers/g

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915/gem: Correct the locking and pin pattern for dma-buf (v8)

2021-07-23 Thread Jason Ekstrand
test error cases Reported-by: Michael J. Ruhl Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström Signed-off-by: Michael J. Ruhl Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c| 37 -- .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_dmabu

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/gem: Migrate to system at dma-buf attach time (v7)

2021-07-23 Thread Jason Ekstrand
-by: Thomas Hellström Signed-off-by: Michael J. Ruhl Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c| 23 - .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 87 ++- 2 files changed, 106

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915/gem: Call i915_gem_flush_free_objects() in i915_gem_dumb_create()

2021-07-23 Thread Jason Ekstrand
This doesn't really fix anything serious since the chances of a client creating and destroying a mass of dumb BOs is pretty low. However, it is called by the other two create IOCTLs to garbage collect old objects. Call it here too for consistency. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Reviewed

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915/gem: Unify user object creation (v3)

2021-07-23 Thread Jason Ekstrand
i915_gem_dumb_create() in a separate patch - Move i915_gem_object_alloc() below the simple error checks v3 (Matthew Auld): - Add __ to i915_gem_object_create_user and kerneldoc which warns the caller that it's not validating anything. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915/gem: Refactor placement setup for i915_gem_object_create* (v2)

2021-07-23 Thread Jason Ekstrand
): - Get rid of MAX_N_PLACEMENTS - Drop kfree(placements) from set_placements() v3 (Matthew Auld): - Properly set ext_data->n_placements Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c | 82 -- 1 file changed,

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/gem/ttm: Only call __i915_gem_object_set_pages if needed

2021-07-23 Thread Jason Ekstrand
__i915_ttm_get_pages to do the migration so this meant it was unsafe to call on an already populated object. This patch checks i915_gem_object_has_pages() before trying to __i915_gem_object_set_pages so i915_ttm_migrate is safe to call, even on populated objects. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand --- drivers

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915/gem: Check object_can_migrate from object_migrate

2021-07-23 Thread Jason Ekstrand
-by: Jason Ekstrand Cc: Daniel Vetter Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c| 13 ++--- .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_migrate.c | 15 --- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915: Migrate memory to SMEM when imported cross-device (v8)

2021-07-23 Thread Jason Ekstrand
egion" - Add a new "drm/i915/gem: Call i915_gem_flush_free_objects() in i915_gem_dumb_create()" - Misc. review feedback from Matthew Auld v8: - Misc. review feedback from Matthew Auld v9: - Replace the i915/ttm patch with two that are hopefully more correct Jason Ekstrand (6):

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Ditch i915 globals shrink infrastructure

2021-07-22 Thread Jason Ekstrand
ybe they would > have said meh. I just don't see how the rush was justified given the > code in question. > > Regards, > > Tvrtko > > > -Daniel > > > >>> Noticed while reviewing a patch set from Jason to fix up some issues > >>&g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/userptr: Probe existence of backing struct pages upon creation

2021-07-22 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 3:44 AM Matthew Auld wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 at 21:28, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 5:16 AM Matthew Auld wrote: > > > > > > From: Chris Wilson > > > > > > Jason Ekstrand req

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/userptr: Probe existence of backing struct pages upon creation

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 5:16 AM Matthew Auld wrote: > > From: Chris Wilson > > Jason Ekstrand requested a more efficient method than userptr+set-domain > to determine if the userptr object was backed by a complete set of pages > upon creation. To be more efficient than

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Ditch i915 globals shrink infrastructure

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
re kernel? That also seems to be pretty good evidence that it's not useful. Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand Feel free to land at-will and I'll deal with merge conflicts on my end. > Cc: David Airlie > Cc: Jason Ekstrand > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i91

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Make the kmem slab for i915_buddy_block a global

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 1:56 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 05:25:41PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: > > On 21/07/2021 16:23, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > There's no reason that I can tell why this should be per-i915_buddy_mm > > > and doing so ca

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/gem: Migrate to system at dma-buf attach time (v7)

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
-by: Thomas Hellström Signed-off-by: Michael J. Ruhl Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c| 23 - .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 87 ++- 2 files changed, 106

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/gem/ttm: Respect the objection region in placement_from_obj

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
d by, say, i915_gem_object_migrate(). Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Cc: Thomas Hellström Cc: Matthew Auld Cc: Maarten Lankhorst --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/gem: Correct the locking and pin pattern for dma-buf (v8)

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
test error cases Reported-by: Michael J. Ruhl Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström Signed-off-by: Michael J. Ruhl Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c| 37 -- .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_dmabu

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/gem: Unify user object creation (v3)

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
i915_gem_dumb_create() in a separate patch - Move i915_gem_object_alloc() below the simple error checks v3 (Matthew Auld): - Add __ to i915_gem_object_create_user and kerneldoc which warns the caller that it's not validating anything. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/gem: Call i915_gem_flush_free_objects() in i915_gem_dumb_create()

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
This doesn't really fix anything serious since the chances of a client creating and destroying a mass of dumb BOs is pretty low. However, it is called by the other two create IOCTLs to garbage collect old objects. Call it here too for consistency. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Reviewed

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/gem: Refactor placement setup for i915_gem_object_create* (v2)

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
): - Get rid of MAX_N_PLACEMENTS - Drop kfree(placements) from set_placements() v3 (Matthew Auld): - Properly set ext_data->n_placements Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c | 82 -- 1 file changed,

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/gem: Check object_can_migrate from object_migrate

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
-by: Jason Ekstrand Cc: Daniel Vetter Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c| 13 ++--- .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_migrate.c | 15 --- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915: Migrate memory to SMEM when imported cross-device (v8)

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
egion" - Add a new "drm/i915/gem: Call i915_gem_flush_free_objects() in i915_gem_dumb_create()" - Misc. review feedback from Matthew Auld v8: - Misc. review feedback from Matthew Auld Jason Ekstrand (5): drm/i915/gem: Check object_can_migrate from object_migrate drm/i915/gem

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/gem/ttm: Respect the objection region in placement_from_obj

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 8:35 AM Matthew Auld wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 20:49, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 1:45 PM Matthew Auld > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 18:39, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: Fix cached atomics setting for Windows VM

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 4:08 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 8:21 AM Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > We've seen recent regression with host and windows VM running > > simultaneously that cause gpu hang or even crash. Finally bisect to > > 58586680ffad ("drm/i915: Disable atomics in L3

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/gem: Refactor placement setup for i915_gem_object_create* (v2)

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 3:32 AM Matthew Auld wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 23:07, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 3:18 AM Matthew Auld > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 15:14, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/gem: Unify user object creation

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 3:25 AM Matthew Auld wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 23:04, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 4:35 AM Matthew Auld > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 at 23:39, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Correct the docs for intel_engine_cmd_parser

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
Would you mind pushing? I still don't have those magic powers. :-) --Jason On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 5:05 AM Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 04:04:59PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 3:26 PM Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > > > >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Make the kmem slab for i915_buddy_block a global

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
situations. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Fixes: 88be9a0a06b7 ("drm/i915/ttm: add ttm_buddy_man") Cc: Matthew Auld Cc: Christian König --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.c | 44 ++--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.h | 3 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_globals.c

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/ttm: Initialize debugfs from ttm_global_init()

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
, we'll re-create those debugfs entries and debugfs will complain in dmesg that we're creating entries that already exist. This patch fixes this problem by changing the lifetime of the whole TTM debugfs directory to match that of the TTM global state. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Reviewed

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/ttm: Force re-init if ttm_global_init() fails

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
If we have a failure, decrement the reference count so that the next call to ttm_global_init() will actually do something instead of assume everything is all set up. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Fixes: 62b53b37e4b1 ("drm/ttm: use a static ttm_bo_global instance") Reviewed-by: Chris

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Use a table for i915_init/exit (v2)

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
ing down the partially loaded driver. v2 (Tvrtko Ursulin): - Guard init_funcs[i].exit with GEM_BUG_ON(i >= ARRAY_SIZE(init_funcs)) v2 (Daniel Vetter): - Update the docstring for i915.mock_selftests Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin --- drivers/g

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Call i915_globals_exit() if pci_register_device() fails

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
In the unlikely event that pci_register_device() fails, we were tearing down our PMU setup but not globals. This leaves a bunch of memory slabs lying around. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Fixes: 32eb6bcfdda9 ("drm/i915: Make request allocation caches global") Reviewed-by: Dan

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] Fix the debugfs splat from mock selftests (v3)

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
an show up in other random IGTs depending on test execution order. Jason Ekstrand (6): drm/i915: Call i915_globals_exit() after i915_pmu_exit() drm/i915: Call i915_globals_exit() if pci_register_device() fails drm/i915: Use a table for i915_init/exit (v2) drm/ttm: Force re-init if ttm_global_in

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Call i915_globals_exit() after i915_pmu_exit()

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
We should tear down in the opposite order we set up. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Always call i915_globals_exit() from i915_exit()

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 6:26 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 09:55:22AM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 9:18 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 01:30:44PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Use a table for i915_init/exit

2021-07-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 4:06 AM Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > On 20/07/2021 19:13, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > If the driver was not fully loaded, we may still have globals lying > > around. If we don't tear those down in i915_exit(), we'll leak a bunch > > of memory slabs

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/gem: Refactor placement setup for i915_gem_object_create* (v2)

2021-07-20 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 3:18 AM Matthew Auld wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 15:14, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > > Since we don't allow changing the set of regions after creation, we can > > make ext_set_placements() build up the region set directly in the &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/gem: Unify user object creation

2021-07-20 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 4:35 AM Matthew Auld wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 at 23:39, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > > Instead of hand-rolling the same three calls in each function, pull them > > into an i915_gem_object_create_user helper. Apart from re-ordering of > &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/gem: Correct the locking and pin pattern for dma-buf (v6)

2021-07-20 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 4:07 AM Matthew Auld wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 15:14, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > > From: Thomas Hellström > > > > If our exported dma-bufs are imported by another instance of our driver, > > that instance will typically have

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/gem: Migrate to system at dma-buf attach time (v6)

2021-07-20 Thread Jason Ekstrand
Fixed all the nits below locally. It'll be in the next send. On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 5:53 AM Matthew Auld wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 15:14, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > > From: Thomas Hellström > > > > Until we support p2p dma or as a complement to th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Correct the docs for intel_engine_cmd_parser

2021-07-20 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 3:26 PM Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 04:25:21PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 01:21:08PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > In c9d9fdbc108a ("drm/i915: Revert "drm/i915/gem: Asynchronous >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Correct the docs for intel_engine_cmd_parser

2021-07-20 Thread Jason Ekstrand
In c9d9fdbc108a ("drm/i915: Revert "drm/i915/gem: Asynchronous cmdparser""), the parameters to intel_engine_cmd_parser() were altered without updating the docs, causing Fi.CI.DOCS to start failing. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c | 4

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Make the kmem slab for i915_buddy_block a global

2021-07-20 Thread Jason Ekstrand
situations. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Fixes: 88be9a0a06b7 ("drm/i915/ttm: add ttm_buddy_man") Cc: Matthew Auld --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.c | 44 ++--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.h | 3 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_globals.c | 2 ++ 3 files c

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/ttm: Initialize debugfs from ttm_global_init()

2021-07-20 Thread Jason Ekstrand
, we'll re-create those debugfs entries and debugfs will complain in dmesg that we're creating entries that already exist. This patch fixes this problem by changing the lifetime of the whole TTM debugfs directory to match that of the TTM global state. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Reviewed

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/ttm: Force re-init if ttm_global_init() fails

2021-07-20 Thread Jason Ekstrand
If we have a failure, decrement the reference count so that the next call to ttm_global_init() will actually do something instead of assume everything is all set up. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Fixes: 62b53b37e4b1 ("drm/ttm: use a static ttm_bo_global instance") Reviewed-by: Chris

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Use a table for i915_init/exit

2021-07-20 Thread Jason Ekstrand
ing down the partially loaded driver. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 104 -- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 3 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.h |

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Call i915_globals_exit() if pci_register_device() fails

2021-07-20 Thread Jason Ekstrand
In the unlikely event that pci_register_device() fails, we were tearing down our PMU setup but not globals. This leaves a bunch of memory slabs lying around. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Fixes: 32eb6bcfdda9 ("drm/i915: Make request allocation caches global") Reviewed-by: Dan

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Call i915_globals_exit() after i915_pmu_exit()

2021-07-20 Thread Jason Ekstrand
We should tear down in the opposite order we set up. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] Fix the debugfs splat from mock selftests

2021-07-20 Thread Jason Ekstrand
an show up in other random IGTs depending on test execution order. Jason Ekstrand (6): drm/i915: Call i915_globals_exit() after i915_pmu_exit() drm/i915: Call i915_globals_exit() if pci_register_device() fails drm/i915: Use a table for i915_init/exit drm/ttm: Force re-init if ttm_global_init() f

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Check for nomodeset in i915_init() first

2021-07-20 Thread Jason Ekstrand
unwinding - if you run selftest with > nomodeset you get nothing, *shrug*. > > Cc: Jason Ekstrand > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 16 > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Always call i915_globals_exit() from i915_exit()

2021-07-20 Thread Jason Ekstrand
Sorry... didn't reply to everything the first time On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 3:25 AM Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > On 19/07/2021 19:30, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > If the driver was not fully loaded, we may still have globals lying > > around. If we don't tear those down in i9

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Always call i915_globals_exit() from i915_exit()

2021-07-20 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 9:18 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 01:30:44PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > If the driver was not fully loaded, we may still have globals lying > > around. If we don't tear those down in i915_exit(), we'll leak a bunch &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Always call i915_globals_exit() from i915_exit()

2021-07-20 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 3:25 AM Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > On 19/07/2021 19:30, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > If the driver was not fully loaded, we may still have globals lying > > around. If we don't tear those down in i915_exit(), we'll leak a bunch > > of memory slabs

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/uapi: reject set_domain for discrete

2021-07-19 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 4:10 AM Matthew Auld wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 16:23, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 9:52 AM Tvrtko Ursulin > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 15/07/2021 11:15, Matthew Auld wrote: &

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/ttm: Initialize debugfs from ttm_global_init()

2021-07-19 Thread Jason Ekstrand
, we'll re-create those debugfs entries and debugfs will complain in dmesg that we're creating entries that already exist. This patch fixes this problem by changing the lifetime of the whole TTM debugfs directory to match that of the TTM global state. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand --- drivers/gpu

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Make the kmem slab for i915_buddy_block a global

2021-07-19 Thread Jason Ekstrand
situations. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Fixes: 88be9a0a06b7 ("drm/i915/ttm: add ttm_buddy_man") Cc: Matthew Auld --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.c | 44 ++--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.h | 3 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_globals.c | 2 ++ 3 files c

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/ttm: Force re-init if ttm_global_init() fails

2021-07-19 Thread Jason Ekstrand
If we have a failure, decrement the reference count so that the next call to ttm_global_init() will actually do something instead of assume everything is all set up. Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand Fixes: 62b53b37e4b1 ("drm/ttm: use a static ttm_bo_global instance") Cc: Chris

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >