Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Wait for vblank after register read

For the PW results: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/41877/ it didn't fix the CRC mismatch on: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_8731/shard-snb6/igt@kms_frontbuffer_track...@fbc-1p-pri-indfb-multidraw.html but that test has always failed on SNB:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Check for I915_MODE_FLAG_INHERITED before drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset

Nikula [mailto:jani.nik...@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Friday, March 2, 2018 11:37 AM > To: Lyude Paul <ly...@redhat.com>; Maarten Lankhorst > <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>; Lofstedt, Marta

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] kernel/panic: Repeat the line and caller information at the end of the OOPS

OK cool I'll look out for it landing, CI_DRM_3838 or CI_DRM_3839 I guess. > -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 12:50 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] kernel/panic: Repeat the line and caller information at the end of the OOPS

Seems like a good idea to me. +Mika > -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 3:53 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>; Lofstedt, Marta > &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/kms_force_connector_basic: Clear any previous connector override

ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>; > Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com> > Subject: [PATCH igt] igt/kms_force_connector_basic: Clear any previous > connector override > > When searching for a VGA connector to use to test overriding the connector > status, we requ

Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH igt 1/2] igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Disable FBC testing for -ENODEV

While you are at it could you fix the kms_fbcon_fbt test in the same manner? And you'll have my R-b > -Original Message- > From: igt-dev [mailto:igt-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of > Chris Wilson > Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 11:00 AM > To:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] AWOOGA: Revert "ALSA: hda: Make use of core codec functions to sync power state"

See bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105069 > -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Saarinen, Jani > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 9:35 AM > To: Kumar, Abhijeet ; Takashi Iwai >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/guc: Fix lockdep due to log relay channel handling under struct_mutex

A <sagar.a.kam...@intel.com>; Wajdeczko, Michal > <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>; Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele > <daniele.ceraolospu...@intel.com>; Ursulin, Tvrtko > <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>; Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>; Joonas > Lahtinen <joon

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915/guc: Keep GuC log disabled by default

ri...@intel.com>; > Sarvela, Tomi P <tomi.p.sarv...@intel.com>; Lofstedt, Marta > <marta.lofst...@intel.com>; Winiarski, Michal <michal.winiar...@intel.com> > Subject: [RFC] drm/i915/guc: Keep GuC log disabled by default > > It looks that GuC log functionality is

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] test/gem_ctx_param - Use the last I915_CONTEXT_PARAM+1 for invalid tests

> -Original Message- > From: Tvrtko Ursulin [mailto:tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 1:46 PM > To: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com>; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] test/kms_psr_sink_crc - subtests psr_basic and psr_drrs need test cleanup

Arek, I didn't get any PW for this maybe because I sent it together with a HACK patch to get a test run on BAT. Should I rename both patches and re-send to the list? /Marta > -Original Message- > From: Lofstedt, Marta > Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 4:07 PM > T

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] test/kms_psr_sink_crc - Hack to test test_cleanup() for psr_basic

Doesn't look like it is needed for the psr_drrs https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_744/all.html From: Lofstedt, Marta Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2018 1:37 PM To: Latvala, Petri Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] test/kms_psr_sink_crc - Hack to test test_cleanup() for psr_basic

> -Original Message- > From: Latvala, Petri > Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 2:11 PM > To: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] test/kms_psr_sink_crc - Hack to test > t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] test/kms_psr_sink_crc - Hack to test test_cleanup() for psr_basic

+Petri PW results are looking good. https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_741/issues.html From: Lofstedt, Marta Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2018 11:54 AM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Lofstedt, Marta Subject: [PATCH i-g-t] test

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] kms_atomic_transition: Remove skip_on_unsupported_nonblocking_modeset.

Reviewed-by: Marta Lofstedt > -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Maarten Lankhorst > Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 11:19 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] test/kms_sysfs_edid_timing : Increase THRESHOLD_PER_CONNECTOR and THRESHOLD_TOTAL

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/35365/ Judging from PW results, THRESHOLD_TOTAL 95 is still not enough for KBL-shards. That is interesting. /Marta > -Original Message- > From: Lofstedt, Marta > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 5:44 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.fre

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Taint (TAINT_DIE) the kernel if the GPU reset fails

> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Chris Wilson > Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 4:06 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915: Print the condition causing GEM_BUG_ON

, 2017 10:40 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>; Chris Wilson > <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>; Joonas Lahtinen > <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>; Lofstedt, Marta > <marta.lofst...@intel.com> > Subje

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_eio: Skip in-flight-suspend on snb

> -Original Message- > From: Lofstedt, Marta > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 1:57 PM > To: 'Martin Peres' <martin.pe...@linux.intel.com>; Joonas Lahtinen > <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>; Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>; > I

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_eio: Skip in-flight-suspend on snb

ll.ch>; Intel Graphics Development g...@lists.freedesktop.org>; Latvala, Petri <petri.latv...@intel.com> > Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>; Lofstedt, Marta > <marta.lofst...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_eio: Skip in-flight-suspen

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_eio: Skip in-flight-suspend on snb

@ffwll.ch>; Joonas Lahtinen > <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>; Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>; > Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com>; Martin Peres > <martin.pe...@linux.intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_eio: Skip in-flight-suspend on snb

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] kms_atomic_transition: Output more finegrained progress info to avoid CI watchdog timeout

> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Daniel Vetter > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 5:36 PM > To: Latvala, Petri > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t]

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 i-g-t] tests/kms: increase max threshold time for edid read

This is still an issue, can we please come to some consensus. My position is to take the V1. /Marta > -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Daniel Vetter > Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 10:59 AM > To: Taylor, Clinton A

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915/cnl: WaDisableGatherAtSetShaderCommonSlice (rev2)

From: Vivi, Rodrigo Sent: Friday, October 06, 2017 3:10 PM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Lofstedt, Marta; Martin Peres Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915/cnl: WaDisableGatherAtSetShaderCommonSlice (rev2) On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 11:06:34AM +, Patchwork

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt/kms_rotation_crc : Fix flip tests for sprite plane

Thanks Maarten, Tested-by: Marta Lofstedt Acked-by: Marta Lofstedt > -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Maarten Lankhorst > Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:38 AM >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt/kms_rotation_crc : Remove flip tests for sprite plane

When I have some time I will try to fix the test instead of deleting it. /Marta > -Original Message- > From: Ville Syrjälä [mailto:ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 5:30 PM > To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com> >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt/kms_rotation_crc : Remove flip tests for sprite plane

> -Original Message- > From: Ville Syrjälä [mailto:ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 4:13 PM > To: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt/kms_ro

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt/kms_rotation_crc : Remove flip tests for sprite plane

> -Original Message- > From: Ville Syrjälä [mailto:ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 4:02 PM > To: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt/kms_ro

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Unset legacy_cursor_update early in intel_atomic_commit

ankho...@linux.intel.com>; Daniel Vetter > <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>; Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com>; Lofstedt, > Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com> > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Unset legacy_cursor_update early in > intel_atomic_commit > > Commit b4

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE

> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel > Vetter > Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 3:10 PM > To: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx]

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: increase FBC wait timeout to 5s

e- > From: Lofstedt, Marta > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 4:34 PM > To: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Zanoni, Paulo R <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com> > Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tra

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: increase FBC wait timeout to 5s

+paulo > -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 4:12 PM > To: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com>; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: increase FBC wait timeout to 5s

> -Original Message- > From: Lofstedt, Marta > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 2:54 PM > To: 'Chris Wilson' <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: > increas

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: increase FBC wait timeout to 5s

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 1:47 PM > To: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com>; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/kms_frontbuf

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Assert the context is not closed on object-close

Thanks Chris, With this series the test pin-pointed in the bug now pass. Tested-by: Marta Lofstedt > -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Chris Wilson > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 2:05 PM > To:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Beef up the IPS vs. CRC workaround

om>; Daniel Vetter > <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>; Maarten Lankhorst > <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>; Lofstedt, Marta > <marta.lofst...@intel.com> > Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Beef up the IPS vs. CRC workaround > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.i

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_mmap_write_crc: Add drmModeDirtyFB after dirtying fb

ankho...@linux.intel.com>; Lofstedt, > Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com> > Subject: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_mmap_write_crc: Add drmModeDirtyFB > after dirtying fb > > The test shows the need for coherency through the dma-buf sync ioctl's, but > forgets to call dirtyfb, without thi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: increase FBC wait timeout to 5s

don't think that the objective of this test is performance of domain changes, but if we have no other way to explore that issue, I guess we should not change the timeout. /Marta > -Original Message- > From: Lofstedt, Marta > Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 2:15 PM > To: Zan

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 i-g-t] tests/kms: increase max threshold time for edid read

> -Original Message- > From: Taylor, Clinton A > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 8:50 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Taylor, Clinton A <clinton.a.tay...@intel.com>; Vetter, Daniel > <daniel.vet...@intel.com>; Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst..

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Keep IPS disabled during CRC collection

Tested-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> > -Original Message- > From: Maarten Lankhorst [mailto:maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 12:55 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofs

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 i-g-t] tests/kms: increase max threshold time for edid read

); - if (lspcon_present || (edid_size > 128 && + if (lspcon_present || (edid_size >= 128 && !strncmp(de->d_name, "card0-HDMI", 10))) { threshold *= HDMI_THRESHOLD_MULTIPLIER; } > -Origina

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 i-g-t] tests/kms: increase max threshold time for edid read

> Cc: Taylor, Clinton A <clinton.a.tay...@intel.com>; Vetter, Daniel > <daniel.vet...@intel.com>; Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com> > Subject: [PATCH v3 i-g-t] tests/kms: increase max threshold time for edid > read > > From: Clint Taylor <clinton.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: increase FBC wait timeout to 5s

> -Original Message- > From: Zanoni, Paulo R > Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 5:54 PM > To: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com>; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Latvala, Petri <petri.latv...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/k

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms: increase max threshold time for edid read

Thanks Clinton! If you add: Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100047 You have my Rb. /Marta > -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of clinton.a.tay...@intel.com > Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 9:23 PM > To:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: increase FBC wait timeout to 5s

> -Original Message- > From: Zanoni, Paulo R > Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 9:56 PM > To: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com>; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Latvala, Petri <petri.latv...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/k

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] kms_busy: Fix basic-modeset-* name format parameters

Reviewed-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> > -Original Message- > From: Lofstedt, Marta > Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 3:05 PM > To: 'Petri Latvala' <petri.latv...@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@f

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] kms_busy: Fix basic-modeset-* name format parameters

Thanks Petri, now I can run testlists again! > -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Petri Latvala > Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 2:45 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Daniel Vetter >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: increase FBC wait timeout to 5s

+Paolo > -Original Message- > From: Lofstedt, Marta > Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 2:17 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Latvala, Petri <petri.latv...@intel.com>; Lofstedt, Marta > <marta.lofst...@intel.com> > Subject: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/k

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/kms_plane_multiple: Fix reference CRC

; Cc: dan...@ffwll.ch; Latvala, Petri <petri.latv...@intel.com>; Lofstedt, Marta > <marta.lofst...@intel.com> > Subject: [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/kms_plane_multiple: Fix reference CRC > > kms_plane_multiple wrongly expected that igt lib function would modify the > passed igt_c

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_plane_multiple: Fix reference CRC

FYI, bug 101907 > -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Daniel Vetter > Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 2:37 PM > To: Kahola, Mika > Cc: intel-gfx > Subject: Re:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt/meta_test: Add a warn subtest to make sure warnings are caught as expected.

ankho...@linux.intel.com>; Lofstedt, > Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com>; Latvala, Petri <petri.latv...@intel.com> > Subject: [PATCH i-g-t] igt/meta_test: Add a warn subtest to make sure > warnings are caught as expected. > > Cc: Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt/meta_test: Add a warn subtest to make sure warnings are caught as expected.

<maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>; Lofstedt, > Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com>; Latvala, Petri <petri.latv...@intel.com> > Subject: [PATCH i-g-t] igt/meta_test: Add a warn subtest to make sure > warnings are caught as expected. > > Cc: Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofst...@inte

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_rmfb: Fix cursor fb size

Tested OK, also NOTE that this fixes bug 97975 /Marta > -Original Message- > From: ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com [mailto:ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:29 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@in

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] lib/kms: Force a full reprobe if we find a bad link

hat has been created by the test itself or other tests. /Marta > -Original Message- > From: Martin Peres [mailto:martin.pe...@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 2:59 PM > To: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; > Lofstedt, Marta

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/initial_state: Add a test to capture the state of the GPU

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 12:48 PM > To: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch>; Martin Peres > <martin.pe...@linux.intel.com&

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/initial_state: Add a test to capture the state of the GPU

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 12:04 PM > To: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch>; Martin Peres > <martin.pe...@linux.intel.com&

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/initial_state: Add a test to capture the state of the GPU

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 11:21 AM > To: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch>; Martin Peres > <martin.pe...@linux.intel.com&

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/initial_state: Add a test to capture the state of the GPU

May 15, 2017 5:01 PM > To: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>; Martin Peres > <martin.pe...@linux.intel.com>; Lofstedt, Marta > <marta.lofst...@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/initial_state: Add a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ALSA: hda: Use loop counter for hdac_wait_for_cmd_dmas() timeout

Chris, Jeeja already has a patch that fix this issue in bug 100419, this also "happens" to be identical to a patch a sent on an internal mail to Intel audio developers on the 5 of April. But, then they replied they wanted another solution. I guess it is up to audio dev to decide what solution

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v4,1/2] PCI / PM: Add needs_resume flag to avoid suspend complete optimization

eds of passing tests. > -Original Message- > From: Deak, Imre > Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 11:41 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nik...@intel.com>; Chris Wilson <chris@chris- > wilson.co.uk>; Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>; Lo

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: Prevent the system suspend complete optimization

> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 1:29 PM > To: Lukas Wunner <lu...@wunner.de> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wysocki, Rafael J > <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>; Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com>; > David Weinehall <david.weineh...@linux.intel.com>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/15] drm/i915: Two stage watermarks for g4x

Thanks Ville, I have verified that below patch-set fix the CI regression on the Core2 duo, see bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100548 So, if/when this patch-set lands, I assume we could revert the revert of the "sched/clock: Fix broken stable to unstable transfer":

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/meta_test: Add a meta test for sanity checks of CI systems

> -Original Message- > From: Latvala, Petri > Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 12:08 PM > To: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/meta_test: Add a meta test for sanity checks > of

Re: [Intel-gfx] freedesktop bug id: 100548, bisected to sched/clock commit

> -Original Message- > From: Peter Zijlstra [mailto:pet...@infradead.org] > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 4:24 PM > To: Martin Peres <martin.pe...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com>; > pasha.tatas...@oracle.com; intel-gfx

[Intel-gfx] freedesktop bug id: 100548, bisected to sched/clock commit

Hi, We have this "old" Lenovo Cantiga laptop(Intel Core 2 Duo L9400), hocked up to our i915 pre-merge CI system, that has started to give unstable results after commit: commit 7b09cc5a9debc86c903c2eff8f8a1fdef773c649 Author: Pavel Tatashin Date: Wed Mar 22